Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33772614›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2021

Clinical applications of pelvic floor imaging: opinion statement endorsed by the society of abdominal radiology (SAR), American Urological Association (AUA), and American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS).

Victoria Chernyak, Joshua Bleier, Mariya Kobi, Ian Paquette, Milana Flusberg, Philippe Zimmern, Larissa V Rodriguez, Phyllis Glanc, Suzanne Palmer, Luz Maria Rodriguez and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. X-ray video defaecography is superior to magnetic resonance defaecography in the imaging of defaecation disorders.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Victoria ChernyakSAR DFP, Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, The Bronx, USA. vichka17@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5715-1403
Joshua BleierDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Rockville, MD, USA.
Mariya KobiSAR DFP, Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, The Bronx, USA.
Ian PaquetteDivision of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, USA.
Milana FlusbergSAR DFP, Department of Radiology, Westchester Medical Center (Valhalla, NY), Valhalla, USA.
Philippe ZimmernAUA, Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA.
Larissa V RodriguezAUA, Departments of Urology and Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Phyllis GlancSAR DFP, Department of Radiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, USA.
Suzanne PalmerSAR DFP, Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.
Luz Maria RodriguezWalter National Military Medical Center (WRNMMC), Department of Surgery and National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Prevention (DCP), Gastrointestinal & Other Cancers Research Group, SSO and AACR, Bethesda, USA.
Marsha K GuessUniversity of Colorado Denver School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
Milena M WeinsteinMassachusetts General Hospital Pelvic Floor Disorders Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Roopa RamDepartment of Radiology, SAR DFP, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, USA.
Kedar JambhekarDepartment of Radiology, SAR DFP, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, USA.
Gaurav KhatriDepartment of Radiology, SAR DFP, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pelvic floor dysfunction is prevalent, with multifactorial causes and variable clinical presentations. Accurate diagnosis and assessment of the involved structures commonly requires a multidisciplinary approach. Imaging is often complementary to clinical assessment, and the most commonly used modalities for pelvic floor imaging include fluoroscopic defecography, magnetic resonance defecography, and pelvic floor ultrasound. This collaboration opinion paper was developed by representatives from multiple specialties involved in care of patients with pelvic floor dysfunction (radiologists, urogynecologists, urologists, and colorectal surgeons). Here, we discuss the utility of imaging techniques in various clinical scenarios, highlighting the perspectives of referring physicians. The final draft was endorsed by the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR), American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS), and the American Urological Association (AUA).

Indexed as

Pelvic Floor DisordersRadiologyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPelvic FloorRadiography, AbdominalUltrasonographyUnited States

Identifiers

PMID33772614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.