Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33772607›Full record

Observational studyEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2021

How face masks influence the sinonasal quality of life during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Adi Primov-Fever, Ofer Amir, Ilan Roziner, Ramit Maoz-Segal, Eran Emanuel Alon, Arkadi Yakirevitch

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Adi Primov-FeverDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, 52621, Tel-Hashomer, Israel.
Ofer AmirThe Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Ilan RozinerThe Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Ramit Maoz-SegalThe Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Eran Emanuel AlonDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, 52621, Tel-Hashomer, Israel.
Arkadi YakirevitchDepartment of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, 52621, Tel-Hashomer, Israel. arkadiyak@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2540-3549

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo study different mask types' impact on a sinonasal quality of life.

methodsFor this observational cross-sectional study, a web-based survey was distributed via social media forums. We used the validated Hebrew version of the Sinonasal Outcome Test-22 followed by a questionnaire developed specifically for the present study, focusing on the time of the COVID-19 pandemic (Mask Sinonasal Outcome Test), and questions regarding general health issues. The participants' mask-wearing routine was also studied.

resultsSeventy percent of 351 participants had experienced a change in their breathing during the time of the pandemic. The median total Sinonasal Outcome Test-22 score was 13, and 10% of the participants reported a significantly impaired quality of life. According to multivariate analyses, the only subject-related variables significantly associated with the reduced sinonasal quality of life were female gender, younger age, a background of chronic rhinitis and sinusitis, and the mask-wearing average daily duration. The mask sinonasal outcome test convergent validity was confirmed.

conclusionThe majority of our survey's responders, predominantly female and younger participants, reported reduced sinonasal quality of life in the COVID-19 pandemic period. It can be attributed to mask-wearing, especially for a prolonged time, irrespective of the existing mask type. These findings should encourage medical companies to produce more "airway-minded" personal protection equipment.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsFemaleHumansMasksQuality of LifeSARS-CoV-2COVID-19MasksQuality of lifeQuestionnairesSino-nasal outcome test

Identifiers

PMID33772607
PMCPMC7998091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.