Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33772601›Full record

ArticleArchives of microbiology2021

In vitro validation studies for adhesion factor and adhesion efficiency of probiotic Bacillus licheniformis MCC 2514 and Bifidobacterium breve NCIM 5671 on HT-29 cell lines.

H S Rohith, Prakash Motiram Halami

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Probiotic properties ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Pharmaceutics · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Characterization of lactic acid bacteria isolated from the poultry intestinal environment with anti-Salmonella activity in vitro.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. DietaryFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  13. Potential application of the probioticFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

H S RohithDepartment of Microbiology and Fermentation Technology, CSIR-Central Food Technological Research Institute, Mysuru, 570020, Karnataka, India.
Prakash Motiram HalamiDepartment of Microbiology and Fermentation Technology, CSIR-Central Food Technological Research Institute, Mysuru, 570020, Karnataka, India. prakashalami@cftri.res.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0293-1891
Central Food Technological Research Institute · IN

Funding

Science and Engineering Research Board EEQ/2016/000310
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Probiotic bacterial adhesion to the epithelial cell is a composite process and in vivo adhesion studies can be strengthened with the improved in vitro models for preliminary screening of potentially adherent strains. With this rationale, the study aimed is the first report to demonstrate the colonizing efficiency of probiotic Bacillus licheniformis MCC 2514 in comparison to Bifidobacterium breve NCIM 5671on HT-29 cell line. B. licheniformis (54.28 ± 0.99%) and Bif. breve (70.23 ± 0.85%) adhered in a higher percentage on fibronectin and mucin, respectively. However, the adhesion was higher for B. licheniformis when compared to Bif. breve. In adhesion score, B. licheniformis obtained about 138.85 ± 12.32, whereas Bif. breve got the score of 43.05 ± 9.12. The same trend continued in the adhesion percentage study, where B. licheniformis adhered 75.5 ± 5.2%, higher than Bif. breve which adhered 32.66 ± 3.2%. In invasion assay, both the bacteria significantly decreased the colonization of the pathogen Kocuria rhizophila ATCC 9341 about 97.32 ± 0.81% in the competitive assay, 97.87 ± 0.73% in exclusion assay and 82.19 ± 2.51% in displacement assay. The cytotoxicity effects of the test bacterial strains against HT-29 cell line through MTT assay determined no viability loss in the treated cells. Therefore, the data obtained from the in vitro studies showed that both B. licheniformis and Bif. breve had shown significantly good invasion on pathogen and adhesion capacity on HT-29 cell line.

Indexed as

AntibiosisBacillus licheniformisBacterial AdhesionBifidobacterium breveProbioticsHT29 CellsHumansMicrococcaceaeAdhesionBacillusBifidobacteriaHealth benefitsInvasionProbiotics

Identifiers

PMID33772601
OpenAlexW3132444651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.