Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33772335›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2021

Convolutional neural networks for PET functional volume fully automatic segmentation: development and validation in a multi-center setting.

Andrei Iantsen, Marta Ferreira, Francois Lucia, Vincent Jaouen, Caroline Reinhold, Pietro Bonaffini, Joanne Alfieri, Ramon Rovira, Ingrid Masson, Philippe Robin and 10 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Systematic review of artificial intelligence in brachytherapy.Journal of contemporary brachytherapy · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cervical cancer segmentation based on medical images: a literature review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Accurate Tumor DelineationFrontiers in oncology · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Andrei IantsenLaTIM, INSERM, UMR 1101, University Brest, Brest, France. andrei.iantsen@inserm.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-6690-6070
Marta FerreiraGIGA-CRC in vivo Imaging, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Francois LuciaLaTIM, INSERM, UMR 1101, University Brest, Brest, France.
Vincent JaouenLaTIM, INSERM, UMR 1101, University Brest, Brest, France.
Caroline ReinholdDepartment of Radiology, McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), Montreal, Canada.
Pietro BonaffiniDepartment of Radiology, McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), Montreal, Canada.
Joanne AlfieriDepartment of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), Montreal, Canada.
Ramon RoviraGynecology Oncology and Laparoscopy Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Ingrid MassonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest (ICO), Nantes, France.
Philippe RobinNuclear Medicine Department, University Hospital, Brest, France.
Augustin MervoyerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest (ICO), Nantes, France.
Caroline RousseauNuclear Medicine Department, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest (ICO), Nantes, France.
Frédéric KridelkaDivision of Oncological Gynecology, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Marjolein DecuypereDivision of Oncological Gynecology, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Pierre LovinfosseDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Oncological Imaging, University Hospital of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Olivier PradierLaTIM, INSERM, UMR 1101, University Brest, Brest, France.
Roland HustinxGIGA-CRC in vivo Imaging, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Ulrike SchickLaTIM, INSERM, UMR 1101, University Brest, Brest, France.
Dimitris VisvikisLaTIM, INSERM, UMR 1101, University Brest, Brest, France.
Mathieu HattLaTIM, INSERM, UMR 1101, University Brest, Brest, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn this work, we addressed fully automatic determination of tumor functional uptake from positron emission tomography (PET) images without relying on other image modalities or additional prior constraints, in the context of multicenter images with heterogeneous characteristics.

methodsIn cervical cancer, an additional challenge is the location of the tumor uptake near or even stuck to the bladder. PET datasets of 232 patients from five institutions were exploited. To avoid unreliable manual delineations, the ground truth was generated with a semi-automated approach: a volume containing the tumor and excluding the bladder was first manually determined, then a well-validated, semi-automated approach relying on the Fuzzy locally Adaptive Bayesian (FLAB) algorithm was applied to generate the ground truth. Our model built on the U-Net architecture incorporates residual blocks with concurrent spatial squeeze and excitation modules, as well as learnable non-linear downsampling and upsampling blocks. Experiments relied on cross-validation (four institutions for training and validation, and the fifth for testing).

resultsThe model achieved good Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) with little variability across institutions (0.80 ± 0.03), with higher recall (0.90 ± 0.05) than precision (0.75 ± 0.05) and improved results over the standard U-Net (DSC 0.77 ± 0.05, recall 0.87 ± 0.02, precision 0.74 ± 0.08). Both vastly outperformed a fixed threshold at 40% of SUVmax (DSC 0.33 ± 0.15, recall 0.52 ± 0.17, precision 0.30 ± 0.16). In all cases, the model could determine the tumor uptake without including the bladder. Neither shape priors nor anatomical information was required to achieve efficient training.

conclusionThe proposed method could facilitate the deployment of a fully automated radiomics pipeline in such a challenging multicenter context.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerAlgorithmsBayes TheoremHumansPositron-Emission TomographyCervical cancerConvolutional neural networkPETSegmentationU-Net

Identifiers

PMID33772335
PMCPMC8440243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.