Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33772089›Full record

ArticleNPJ precision oncology2021

Characterizing advanced breast cancer heterogeneity and treatment resistance through serial biopsies and comprehensive analytics.

Allen Li, Jamie M Keck, Swapnil Parmar, Janice Patterson, Marilyne Labrie, Allison L Creason, Brett E Johnson, Molly Downey, George Thomas, Carol Beadling and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Overall Survival with Inavolisib inThe New England journal of medicine · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The impact of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway on trastuzumab resistance in HER2-positive gastric cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Molecular Basis of Breast Tumor Heterogeneity.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Nanotechnology Applications in Breast Cancer Immunotherapy.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Allen Li *Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7482-8204
Jamie M Keck *Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Swapnil ParmarKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Janice PattersonKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8969-2933
Marilyne LabrieKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3957-5533
Allison L CreasonKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5724-1276
Brett E JohnsonKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6810-551X
Molly DowneyDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5212-2286
George ThomasKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Carol BeadlingKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Laura M HeiserDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Annette KolodzieKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Alexander R GuimaraesKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Christopher L CorlessKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Joe W GrayKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9225-6756
Gordon B MillsKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0144-9614
Raymond C BerganKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8690-4876
Zahi I MitriKnight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA. mitri@ohsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8765-7723
Oregon Health & Science University · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Understanding the origins of rapid recurrence of pancreatic cancer after resectionP30CA069533 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Luiz Eduardo Bertassoni · 1997 to 2026
$60.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA069533
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular heterogeneity in metastatic breast cancer presents multiple clinical challenges in accurately characterizing and treating the disease. Current diagnostic approaches offer limited ability to assess heterogeneity that exists among multiple metastatic lesions throughout the treatment course. We developed a precision oncology platform that combines serial biopsies, multi-omic analysis, longitudinal patient monitoring, and molecular tumor boards, with the goal of improving cancer management through enhanced understanding of the entire cancer ecosystem within each patient. We describe this integrative approach using comprehensive analytics generated from serial-biopsied lesions in a metastatic breast cancer patient. The serial biopsies identified remarkable heterogeneity among metastatic lesions that presented clinically as discordance in receptor status and genomic alterations with mixed treatment response. Based on our study, we highlight clinical scenarios, such as rapid progression or mixed response, that indicate consideration for repeat biopsies to evaluate intermetastatic heterogeneity (IMH), with the objective of refining targeted therapy. We present a framework for understanding the clinical significance of heterogeneity in breast cancer between metastatic lesions utilizing multi-omic analyses of serial biopsies and its implication for effective personalized treatment.

Identifiers

PMID33772089
PMCPMC7997873
OpenAlexW3139372077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.