Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33771999›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Neural alignment predicts learning outcomes in students taking an introduction to computer science course.

Meir Meshulam, Liat Hasenfratz, Hanna Hillman, Yun-Fei Liu, Mai Nguyen, Kenneth A Norman, Uri Hasson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Thinking as Analogy-Making: Toward a Neural Process Account of General Intelligence.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Meir MeshulamPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA. meshulam@princeton.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5899-7681
Liat HasenfratzPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Hanna HillmanPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8367-1640
Yun-Fei LiuPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Mai NguyenPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.
Kenneth A NormanPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5887-9682
Uri HassonPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3599-7168

Funding

Speaker-listener coupling: a novel neural approach for assessing communicationDP1HD091948 · NICHD · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI HASSON, URI · 2016 to 2021
$5.6M
NICHD NIH HHS DP1 HD091948
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite major advances in measuring human brain activity during and after educational experiences, it is unclear how learners internalize new content, especially in real-life and online settings. In this work, we introduce a neural approach to predicting and assessing learning outcomes in a real-life setting. Our approach hinges on the idea that successful learning involves forming the right set of neural representations, which are captured in canonical activity patterns shared across individuals. Specifically, we hypothesized that learning is mirrored in neural alignment: the degree to which an individual learner's neural representations match those of experts, as well as those of other learners. We tested this hypothesis in a longitudinal functional MRI study that regularly scanned college students enrolled in an introduction to computer science course. We additionally scanned graduate student experts in computer science. We show that alignment among students successfully predicts overall performance in a final exam. Furthermore, within individual students, we find better learning outcomes for concepts that evoke better alignment with experts and with other students, revealing neural patterns associated with specific learned concepts in individuals.

Indexed as

LearningSoftwareCerebral CortexCurriculumEducational MeasurementFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleReproducibility of ResultsStudentsTime FactorsUniversitiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33771999
PMCPMC7997890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.