Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33771912›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2021

Exposure to artificial light at night alters innate immune response in wild great tit nestlings.

Ann-Kathrin Ziegler, Hannah Watson, Arne Hegemann, Richard Meitern, Virginie Canoine, Jan-Åke Nilsson, Caroline Isaksson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Endocrine-circadian interactions in birds: implications when nights are no longer dark.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Ann-Kathrin ZieglerDepartment of Biology, Lund University, 223 62 Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2593-0349
Hannah WatsonDepartment of Biology, Lund University, 223 62 Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4656-0647
Arne HegemannDepartment of Biology, Lund University, 223 62 Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3309-9866
Richard MeiternDepartment of Zoology, University of Tartu, 51005 Tartu, Estonia.ORCID 0000-0002-2600-3002
Virginie CanoineDepartment of Behavioural and Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, 1090Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-2272-0634
Jan-Åke NilssonDepartment of Biology, Lund University, 223 62 Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8982-1064
Caroline IsakssonDepartment of Biology, Lund University, 223 62 Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6889-1386
Lund University · SEUniversity of Tartu · EEUniversity of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The large-scale impact of urbanization on wildlife is rather well documented; however, the mechanisms underlying the effects of urban environments on animal physiology and behaviour are still poorly understood. Here, we focused on one major urban pollutant - artificial light at night (ALAN) - and its effects on the capacity to mount an innate immune response in wild great tit (Parus major) nestlings. Exposure to ALAN alters circadian rhythms of physiological processes, by disrupting the nocturnal production of the hormone melatonin. Nestlings were exposed to a light source emitting 3 lx for seven consecutive nights. Subsequently, nestlings were immune challenged with a lipopolysaccharide injection, and we measured haptoglobin and nitric oxide levels pre- and post-injection. Both haptoglobin and nitric oxide are important markers for innate immune function. We found that ALAN exposure altered the innate immune response, with nestlings exposed to ALAN having lower haptoglobin and higher nitric oxide levels after the immune challenge compared with dark-night nestlings. Unexpectedly, nitric oxide levels were overall lower after the immune challenge than before. These effects were probably mediated by melatonin, as ALAN-treated birds had on average 49% lower melatonin levels than the dark-night birds. ALAN exposure did not have any clear effects on nestling growth. This study provides a potential physiological mechanism underlying the documented differences in immune function between urban and rural birds observed in other studies. Moreover, it gives evidence that ALAN exposure affects nestling physiology, potentially causing long-term effects on physiology and behaviour, which ultimately can affect their fitness.

Indexed as

MelatoninPasseriformesAnimalsCircadian RhythmImmunity, InnateLightMelatoninALANImmune functionLight pollutionMelatoninPhysiologyUrbanization

Identifiers

PMID33771912
PMCPMC8180251
OpenAlexW3139024629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.