Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33771830›Full record

ReviewBMJ open2021

Identifying enablers and barriers to referral, uptake and completion of lifestyle modification programmes: a rapid literature review.

Yvonne Zurynski, Carolynn Smith, Joyce Siette, Bróna Nic Giolla Easpaig, Mary Simons, Gilbert Thomas Knaggs

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Are the ways women cope with stressors related to their health behaviors over time?Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yvonne ZurynskiNHRMC Partnership Centre for Health System Sustainability, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia yvonne.zurynski@mq.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7744-8717
Carolynn SmithNHRMC Partnership Centre for Health System Sustainability, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Joyce SietteAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9568-5847
Bróna Nic Giolla EaspaigAustralian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6787-056X
Mary SimonsLibrary, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9627-7861
Gilbert Thomas KnaggsNHRMC Partnership Centre for Health System Sustainability, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4710-6104
Macquarie University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify current, policy-relevant evidence about barriers and enablers associated with referral, uptake and completion of lifestyle modification programmes (LMPs) for secondary prevention of chronic disease in adults.

designA rapid review, co-designed with policymakers, of peer-reviewed and grey literature using a modified Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses framework. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, Scopus, PsycINFO and CINAHL were searched for relevant studies and literature reviews. Grey literature was identified through Advanced Google searching and targeted searching of international health departments' and non-government organisations' websites. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Documents published 2010-2020, from high-income countries, reporting on programmes that included referral of adults with chronic disease to an LMP by a health professional (HP). DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Data from grey and peer-reviewed literature were extracted by two different reviewers. Extracted data were inductively coded around emergent themes. Regular meetings of the review group ensured consistency of study selection and synthesis.

resultsTwenty-nine documents were included: 14 grey literature, 11 empirical studies and four literature reviews. Key barriers to HPs referring patients included inadequate HP knowledge about LMPs, perceptions of poor effectiveness of LMPs and perceptions that referral to LMPs was not part of their role. Patient barriers to uptake and completion included poor accessibility and lack of support to engage with the LMPs. Enablers to HP referral included training/education, effective interdisciplinary communication and influential programme advocates. Support to engage with LMPs after HP referral, educational resources for family members and easy accessibility were key enablers to patient engagement with LMPs.

conclusionsFactors related to HPs' ability and willingness to make referrals are important for the implementation of LMPs, and need to be coupled with support for patients to engage with programmes after referral. These factors should be addressed when implementing LMPs to maximise their impact.

Indexed as

Behavior TherapyHealth PersonnelAdultHumansLife StyleReferral and Consultationinternational health servicespublic healthqualitative researchquality in health caresocial medicine

Identifiers

PMID33771830
PMCPMC8006838
OpenAlexW3137701224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.