Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33771828›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2021

Maternal body mass index and oxytocin in augmentation of labour in nulliparous women: a prospective observational study.

Anna Ramö Isgren, Preben Kjölhede, Sara Carlhäll, Marie Blomberg

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Use and Effects of Augmentation of Labor with Oxytocin: A Single-Center, Retrospective, Case-Control Study of 4350 Women in Warsaw, Poland, 2015-2020.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anna Ramö IsgrenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University Hospital, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0253-1273
Preben KjölhedeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University Hospital, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5702-4116
Sara CarlhällDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University Hospital, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Marie BlombergDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University Hospital, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden marie.blomberg@liu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4679-550X
Linköping University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate oxytocin use for augmentation of labour in relation to body mass index (BMI) on admission to the labour ward, focusing on cumulative oxytocin dose and maximum rate of oxytocin infusion during the first stage of labour.

designProspective observational study.

settingSeven hospitals in Sweden.

participants1097 nulliparous women with singleton cephalic presentation pregnancy, ≥37 weeks of gestation, spontaneous onset of labour and treatment with oxytocin infusion for labour augmentation. The study population was classified into three BMI subgroups on admission to the labour ward: normal weight (18.5-24.9), overweight (25.0-29.9) and obese (≥30.0). The cumulative oxytocin dose was measured from the start of oxytocin infusion until the neonate was born. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Cumulative oxytocin dose. SECONDARY OUTCOME: Maximum rate of oxytocin infusion during the active phase of first stage of labour.

resultsThe mean cumulative oxytocin dose increased in the BMI groups (normal weight 2278 mU, overweight 3108 mU and obese 4082 mU (p<0.0001)). However, when adjusted for the confounders (cervical dilatation when oxytocin infusion was started, fetal birth weight, epidural analgesia), the significant difference was no longer seen. The maximum oxytocin infusion rate during the first stage of labour differed significantly in the BMI groups when adjusted for the confounding factors individually but not when adjusted for all three factors simultaneously. In addition, the maximum oxytocin infusion rate was significantly higher in women with emergency caesarean section compared with women with vaginal delivery.

conclusionsWomen with increasing BMI with augmentation of labour received a higher cumulative oxytocin dose and had a higher maximum oxytocin infusion rate during first stage of labour, however, when adjusted for relevant confounders, the difference was no longer seen. In the future, the guidelines for augmentation of labour with oxytocin infusion might be reconsidered and include modifications related to BMI.

Indexed as

OxytocicsOxytocinBody Mass IndexCesarean SectionFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancySwedenOxytocicsOxytocinfetal medicinematernal medicineprenatal diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID33771828
PMCPMC8006853
OpenAlexW3136089561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.