Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33771813›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open respiratory research2021

Real-world retrospective observational study exploring the effectiveness and safety of antifibrotics in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

William Alexander Wright, Louise E Crowley, Dhruv Parekh, Anjali Crawshaw, Davinder P Dosanjh, Peter Nightingale, David R Thickett

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open respiratory research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Survival impact and safety comparison of pirfenidone and nintedanib for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A meta-analysis.Sarcoidosis, vasculitis, and diffuse lung diseases : official journal of WASOG · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

William Alexander WrightSchool of Medical and Dental Sciences, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, West Midlands, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8108-962X
Louise E CrowleyDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Dhruv ParekhDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Anjali CrawshawDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Davinder P DosanjhDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Peter NightingaleDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
David R ThickettDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, Birmingham, UK d.thickett@bham.ac.uk.

Funding

Medical Research CouncilMedical Research Council MR/L002736/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPirfenidone and nintedanib are the only disease-modifying treatments available for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Our aim was to test their effectiveness and safety in clinical practice.

methodsThis is a single-centre retrospective observational study undertaken at a specialised interstitial lung disease centre in England. Data including progression-free survival (PFS), mortality and drug tolerability were compared between patients with IPF on antifibrotic therapies and an untreated control group who had a forced vital capacity percentage (FVC %) predicted within the licensed antifibrotic treatment range.

results104 patients received antifibrotic therapies and 64 control patients were identified. PFS at 6 months was significantly greater in the antifibrotic group (75.0%) compared with the control group (56.3%) (p=0.012). PFS was not significant at 12 or 18 months when comparing the antifibrotic group with the control group. The 12-month post-treatment mean decline in FVC % predicted (-4.6±6.2%) was significantly less than the 12-month pretreatment decline (-10.4±11.8%) (p=0.039). The 12-month mortality rate was not significantly different between the antifibrotic group (25.3%) and the control group (35.5%) (p=0.132). Baseline Body Mass Index of≤25, baseline diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide percentage predicted of ≤35 and antifibrotic discontinuation within 3 months were independent predictors of 12-month mortality. Antifibrotic discontinuation was significantly higher by 3 and 6 months for patients on pirfenidone than those on nintedanib (p=0.006 and p=0.044, respectively). Discontinuation at 12 months was not significantly different (p=0.381).

conclusionsThis real-world study revealed that antifibrotics are having promising effects on PFS, lung function and mortality. These findings may favour commencement of nintedanib as first-line antifibrotic therapy, given the lower rates of early treatment discontinuation, although further studies are required to investigate this.

Indexed as

Idiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisLung Diseases, InterstitialEnglandHumansRetrospective StudiesVital Capacityinterstitial fibrosis

Identifiers

PMID33771813
PMCPMC8006845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.