ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2021
Remote by default general practice: must we, should we, dare we?
Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of Cross-Sectoral Video Consultation on Perceived Care Coordination and Information Satisfaction in Cancer Care: Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR formative research · 2025Trial
- The importance of "being seen": a qualitative interview study of patient and clinician experiences of virtual and face-to-face TIA clinics in one region of England.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Safety-netting communication during telephone consultations: an observational study using recorded consultations.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026Observational
- Article
- Acceptability of Telehealth as the Default Modality for Multiple Sclerosis Care in Switzerland: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Article
- The obscured face in video consultations. A Levinasian analysis.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2025Article
- Empathy in technologically mediated patient-provider communication: a phenomenological and postphenomenological exploration.Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM · 2025Article
- The Dynamics of Doctor-Patient Communication During Remote Consultations: Qualitative Study Among Norwegian Contract General Practitioners.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- The Impact and Wider Implications of Remote Consultations for General Practice in Norway: Qualitative Study Among Norwegian Contract General Practitioners.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Article
- Understanding access to general practice through the lens of candidacy: a critical review of the literature.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024Review
- Tailoring communication practices to support effective delivery of telehealth in general practice.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Article
- To What Extent Can Digital Health Technologies Comply With the Principles of Responsible Innovation? Practice-and Policy-Oriented Research Insights Regarding an Organisational and Systemic Issue.International journal of health policy and management · 2024Article
- Evaluating video and hybrid group consultations in general practice: mixed-methods, participatory study protocol (TOGETHER 2).NIHR open research · 2024Article
- Do critical illness survivors with multimorbidity need a different model of care?Critical care (London, England) · 2023Review
- Article
- 'Frailty as an adjective rather than a diagnosis'-identification of frailty in primary care: a qualitative interview study.Age and ageing · 2023Article
- Inclusion health patient perspectives on remote access to general practice: a qualitative study.BJGP open · 2023Article
- Tackling climate change and health inequalities in primary care.Family practice · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issuedCorrection.2021
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.