Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33771392›Full record

ArticleVaccine2021

COVID-19 vaccine intentions in the United States, a social-ecological framework.

Carl Latkin, Lauren A Dayton, Grace Yi, Arianna Konstantopoulos, Ju Park, Catherine Maulsby, Xiangrong Kong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Implications for COVID-19 vaccine uptake: A systematic review.Journal of infection and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Carl LatkinDepartment of Health, Behavior and Society, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, United States; Division of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, United States. Electronic address: clatkin@jhsph.edu.
Lauren A DaytonDepartment of Health, Behavior and Society, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, United States.
Grace YiDepartment of Health, Behavior and Society, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, United States.
Arianna KonstantopoulosKrieger School of Arts & Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, United States.
Ju ParkDepartment of Health, Behavior and Society, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, United States.
Catherine MaulsbyDepartment of Health, Behavior and Society, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, United States.
Xiangrong KongWilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, United States.

Funding

A geospatial analysis of hotspots and targeted injection settings pilot intervention for HIV prevention among people who inject drugs in Baltimore, MarylandR01DA050470 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI LATKIN, CARL A · 2020 to 2025
$4.1M
The Effects of Drug Use, Depression, and Social Factors on HIV/HCV Care Continuum among PWID in Urban Areas: A Social-Network PerspectiveR01DA040488 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI LATKIN, CARL A, TOBIN, KARIN E · 2015 to 2020
$4.0M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA040488NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA050470
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCOVID-19 vaccine hesitancy is a major obstacle for pandemic mitigation. As vaccine hesitancy occurs along multiple dimensions, we used a social-ecological framework to guide the examination of COVID-19 vaccine intentions.

methodsUsing an online survey in the US conducted in July 2020, we examined intentions to obtain a COVID-19 vaccine, once available. 592 respondents provided data, including measures of demographics, vaccine history, social norms, perceived risk, and trust in sources of COVID-19 information. Bivariate and multivariate multinomial models were used to compare respondents who intended to be vaccinated against COVID-19 to respondents who did not intend or were ambivalent about COVID-19 vaccination.

resultsOnly 59.1% of the sample reported that they intended to obtain a COVID-19 vaccine. In the multivariate multinomial model, those respondents who did not intend to be vaccinated, as compared to those who did, had significantly lower levels of trust in the CDC as a source of COVID-19 information (aOR = 0.29, CI = 0.17-0.50), reported lower social norms of COVID-19 preventive behaviors (aOR = 0.67, CI 0.51-0.88), scored higher on COVID-19 Skepticism (aOR = 1.44, CI = 1.28-1.61), identified as more politically conservative (aOR = 1.23, CI = 1.05-1.45), were less likely to have obtained a flu vaccine in the prior year (aOR = 0.21, CI = 0.11-0.39), were less likely to be female (aOR = 0.51, CI = 0.29-0.87), and were much more likely to be Black compared to White (aOR = 10.70, CI = 4.09-28.1). A highly similar pattern was observed among those who were ambivalent about receiving a COVID-19 vaccine compared to those who intended to receive one.

conclusionThe results of this study suggest several avenues for COVID-19 vaccine promotion campaigns, including social network diffusion strategies and cross-partisan messaging, to promote vaccine trust. The racial and gender differences in vaccine intentions also suggest the need to tailor campaigns based on gender and race.

Indexed as

IntentionAdultCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited StatesCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19Social-EcologicalSocial normsVaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID33771392
PMCPMC7945864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.