Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33771351›Full record

ArticleTrends in genetics : TIG2021

Women and Minorities Encouraged to Apply (Not Stay).

Leah C Windsor, Kerry F Crawford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in genetics : TIG, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Leah C WindsorInstitute for Intelligent Systems, The University of Memphis, Memphis, TS, USA. Electronic address: Leah.Windsor@memphis.edu.
Kerry F CrawfordDepartment of Political Science, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA, USA. Electronic address: crawfokf@jmu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has deepened gender and racial diversity problems in academia. Mentorship shows women and other under-represented groups where the ladders to success are, and helps them avoid the chutes, a revised leaky pipeline metaphor. Here, we identify tangible strategies that will improve gender equity, including increasing active mentorship by male academics.

Indexed as

Academies and InstitutesSexual and Gender MinoritiesWomenCOVID-19EmploymentFemaleHumansMaleMentorsUniversitiesCOVID-19equitygendermentorshippandemic

Identifiers

PMID33771351
PMCPMC9754211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.