Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33771150›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

Take-home naloxone programs for suspected opioid overdose in community settings: a scoping umbrella review.

Amina Moustaqim-Barrette, Damon Dhillon, Justin Ng, Kristen Sundvick, Farihah Ali, Tara Elton-Marshall, Pamela Leece, Katherine Rittenbach, Max Ferguson, Jane A Buxton

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06843213 (Teaching Health Promotion and Resilience in Varied Environments), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06843213 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Teaching Health Promotion and Resilience in Varied Environments: a Peer-led Intervention Following Hospital Discharge

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PennsylvaniaRan2025 to 2028Enrolled390ConditionsOpioid Use Disorder, Harm Reduction, Health PromotionArmsPeer Intervention, Enhanced Usual Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Take-home naloxone in multicentre emergency settings: the TIME feasibility cluster RCT.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2024
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Price Sensitivity and Information Barriers to the Take-Up of Naloxone.American economic journal. Economic policy · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Implementation and Evaluation of a Bystander Naloxone Training Course.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Amina Moustaqim-BarretteBC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Damon DhillonFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Justin NgBC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Kristen SundvickFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Farihah AliInstitute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), London, ON, Canada.
Tara Elton-MarshallInstitute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), London, ON, Canada.
Pamela LeeceDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Katherine RittenbachAlberta Health Services (AHS), Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Max FergusonBC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Jane A BuxtonBC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, BC, Canada. jane.buxton@bccdc.ca.
BC Centre for Disease Control · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAPublic Health Ontario · CAAlberta Health Services · CACentre for Addiction and Mental Health · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOpioid related overdoses and overdose deaths continue to constitute an urgent public health crisis. The implementation of naloxone programs, such as 'take-home naloxone' (THN), has emerged as a key intervention in reducing opioid overdose deaths. These programs aim to train individuals at risk of witnessing or experiencing an opioid overdose to recognize an opioid overdose and respond with naloxone. Naloxone effectively reverses opioid overdoses on a physiological level; however, there are outstanding questions on community THN program effectiveness (adverse events, dosing requirements, dose-response between routes of administration) and implementation (accessibility, availability, and affordability). The objective of this scoping review is to identify existing systematic reviews and best practice guidelines relevant to clinical and operational guidance on the distribution of THN.

methodsUsing the Arksey & O'Malley framework for scoping reviews, we searched both academic literature and grey literature databases using keywords (Naloxone) AND (Overdose) AND (Guideline OR Review OR Recommendation OR Toolkit). Only documents which had a structured review of evidence and/or provided summaries or recommendations based on evidence were included (systematic reviews, meta-analyses, scoping reviews, short-cut or rapid reviews, practice/clinical guidelines, and reports). Data were extracted from selected evidence in two key areas: (1) study identifiers; and (2) methodological characteristics.

resultsA total of 47 articles met inclusion criteria: 20 systematic reviews; 10 grey literature articles; 8 short-cut or rapid reviews; 4 scoping reviews; and 5 other review types (e.g. mapping review and comprehensive reviews). The most common subject themes were: naloxone effectiveness, safety, provision feasibility/acceptability of naloxone distribution, dosing and routes of administration, overdose response after naloxone administration, cost-effectiveness, naloxone training and education, and recommendations for policy, practice and gaps in knowledge.

conclusionsSeveral recent systematic reviews address the effectiveness of take-home naloxone programs, naloxone dosing/route of administration, and naloxone provision models. Gaps remain in the evidence around evaluating cost-effectiveness, training parameters and strategies, and adverse events following naloxone administration. As THN programs continue to expand in response to opioid overdose deaths, this review will contribute to understanding the evidence base for policy and THN program development and expansion.

Indexed as

Drug OverdoseOpiate OverdoseOpioid-Related DisordersAnalgesics, OpioidHumansNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsReview Literature as TopicAnalgesics, OpioidNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsFentanylNaloxoneOpiatesOpioid overdoseOpioids

Identifiers

PMID33771150
PMCPMC8004425
OpenAlexW3119141922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.