Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33771107›Full record

ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2021

Appropriate utilization of cardiac computed tomography for the assessment of stable coronary artery disease.

Michael Hammer, Muhtashim Mian, Levi Elhadad, Mary Li, Idan Roifman

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michael Hammer *Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Muhtashim Mian *Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Levi ElhadadSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Mary LiSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Idan RoifmanSunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. idan.roifman@sunnybrook.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-4058-4085

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAppropriate use criteria (AUC) have been developed in response to growth in cardiac imaging utilization and concern regarding associated costs. Cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has emerged as an important modality in the evaluation of coronary artery disease, however its appropriate utilization in actual practice is uncertain. Our objective was to determine the appropriate utilization of CCTA in a large quaternary care institution and to compare appropriate utilization pre and post publication of the 2013 AUC guidelines. We hypothesized that the proportion of appropriate CCTA utilization will be similar to those of other comparable cardiac imaging modalities and that there would be a significant increase in appropriate use post AUC publication.

methodsWe employed a retrospective cohort study design of 2577 consecutive patients undergoing CCTA between January 1, 2012 and December 30, 2016. An appropriateness category was assigned for each CCTA. Appropriateness classifications were compared pre- and post- AUC publication via the chi-square test.

resultsOverall, 83.5% of CCTAs were deemed to be appropriate based on the AUC. Before the AUC publication, 75.0% of CCTAs were classified as appropriate whereas after the AUC publication, 88.0% were classified as appropriate (p < 0.001). The increase in appropriate utilization, when extrapolated to the Medicare population of the United States, was associated with potential cost savings of approximately $57 million per year.

conclusionsWe report a high rate of appropriate use of CCTA and a significant increase in the proportion of CCTAs classified as appropriate after the AUC publication.

Indexed as

Computed Tomography AngiographyCoronary AngiographyPractice Patterns, Physicians'AgedCoronary Artery DiseaseCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleGuideline AdherenceHealth Care CostsHumansMaleMedicareMiddle AgedPractice Guidelines as TopicPredictive Value of TestsRetrospective StudiesAppropriate use criteriaCardiac computed tomographyCoronary artery diseaseValue of non-invasive testing

Identifiers

PMID33771107
PMCPMC7995786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.