Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33770513›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet. Global health2021

The potential role of long-acting injectable cabotegravir-rilpivirine in the treatment of HIV in sub-Saharan Africa: a modelling analysis.

Andrew N Phillips, Loveleen Bansi-Matharu, Valentina Cambiano, Peter Ehrenkranz, Celicia Serenata, Francois Venter, Sarah Pett, Charles Flexner, Andreas Jahn, Paul Revill and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet. Global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Andrew N PhillipsInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK. Electronic address: andrew.phillips@ucl.ac.uk.
Loveleen Bansi-MatharuInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Valentina CambianoInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Peter EhrenkranzBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA, USA.
Celicia SerenataEzintsha, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Francois VenterEzintsha, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Sarah PettInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK; Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK.
Charles FlexnerSchool of Medicine and Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Andreas JahnMinistry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi; International Training and Education Center for Health, Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Paul RevillCentre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK.
Geoff P GarnettBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA, USA.
University College London · GBBill & Melinda Gates Foundation · USUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZAJohns Hopkins University · USMinistry of Health · MWUniversity of York · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00004/03Medical Research Council MC_UU_12023/23Medical Research Council MC_UU_12023/26Medical Research Council MR/T042796/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of a combination of the integrase inhibitor, cabotegravir, and the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, rilpivirine, in a long-acting injectable form is being considered as an antiretroviral treatment option for people with HIV in sub-Saharan Africa. We aimed to model the effects of injectable cabotegravir-rilpivirine to help to inform its potential effectiveness and cost-effectiveness under different possible policies for its introduction.

methodsWe used an existing individual-based model of HIV to predict the effects of introducing monthly injections of cabotegravir-rilpivirine for people with HIV in low-income settings in sub-Saharan Africa. We evaluated policies in the context of 1000 setting scenarios that reflected characteristics of HIV epidemics and programmes in sub-Saharan Africa. We compared three policies for introduction of injectable cabotegravir-rilpivirine with continued use of dolutegravir-based oral regimens for: all individuals on antiretroviral therapy (ART); individuals with a recently measured viral load of more than 1000 copies per mL (signifying poor adherence to oral drugs, and often associated with drug resistance); and individuals with a recently measured viral load of less than 1000 copies per mL (a group with a lower prevalence of pre-existing drug resistance). We also did cost-effectiveness analysis, taking a health system perspective over a 10 year period, with 3% discounting of disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) and costs. A cost-effectiveness threshold of US$500 per DALY averted was used to establish if a policy was cost-effective.

findingsIn our model, all policies involving the introduction of injectable cabotegravir-rilpivirine were predicted to lead to an increased proportion of people with HIV on ART, increased viral load suppression, and decreased AIDS-related mortality, with lesser benefits in people with a recently measured viral load of less than 1000 copies per mL. Its introduction is also predicted to lead to increases in resistance to integrase inhibitors and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors if introduced in all people with HIV on ART or in those with a recently measured viral load of less than 1000 copies per mL, but to a lesser extent if introduced in people with more than 1000 copies per mL due to concentration of its use in people less adherent to oral therapy. Consistent with the effect on AIDS-related mortality, all approaches to the introduction of injectable cabotegravir-rilpivirine are predicted to avert DALYs. Assuming a cost of $120 per person per year, use of this regimen in people with a recently measured viral load of more than 1000 copies per mL was borderline cost-effective (median cost per DALY averted across setting scenarios $404). The other approaches considered for its use are unlikely to be cost-effective unless the cost per year of injectable cabotegravir-rilpivirine is considerably reduced.

interpretationOur modelling suggests that injectable cabotegravir-rilpivirine offers potential benefits; however, to be a cost-effective option, its introduction might need to be carefully targeted to individuals with HIV who might otherwise have suboptimal adherence to ART. As data accumulate from trials and implementation studies, such findings can be incorporated into the model to better inform on the full consequences of policy alternatives.

fundingBill & Melinda Gates Foundation, including through the HIV Modelling Consortium (OPP1191655).

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAfrica South of the SaharaAnti-HIV AgentsCost-Benefit AnalysisDiketopiperazinesDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHIV InfectionsHIV Integrase InhibitorsHumansInjections, IntravenousMaleMiddle AgedPyridonesRilpivirineAnti-HIV AgentscabotegravirDiketopiperazinesHIV Integrase InhibitorsPyridonesRilpivirine

Identifiers

PMID33770513
PMCPMC8050198
OpenAlexW3138429504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.