ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2021
Fabrication and development of a thorax phantom to evaluate 3D CRT treatment planning techniques for post-mastectomy chest wall radiotherapy.
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of Voxel Grid Size and Statistical Uncertainty on Surface Depth Dose Via Various Planning Techniques and Immobilization Devices Using Monte Carlo Algorithm.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to design and fabricate a thorax phantom to quantify the radiation doses to the region of the chest wall (with 3 ionization chambers), the organ at risk (OAR) (lung), and the surface using radiochromic films (EBT3) for three different 3D CRT treatment planning techniques. Anthropomorphic phantoms are one of the best tools for verifying the quality of the radiotherapy treatment plans generated by treatment planning systems since they can provide equivalent human tissue densities. Thirty acrylic plates were cut into ellipses 21 cm in height and 31 cm in width, and slots were created to insert lung equivalent cork material and bone equivalent Teflon material. Three treatment planning techniques were designed: (A) tangential pair beams, (B) tangential pair beams with wedges and (C) tangential beams followed by an anterior oblique beam. The percentage difference between the measured point doses and the calculated doses (measured with three CC13 ionization chambers) ranged from - 3.2 to 1.6%, with a mean deviation of - 1.04 ± 1.3%. The measured mean percentage doses on the target surface with EBT3 film were 90.3% and 95.1% of the prescribed dose with 5-mm and 10-mm boluses, respectively. Finally, the average absolute dose difference between the measured and calculated surface doses was within 10 cGy in all three planning techniques. The developed thorax phantom is suitable for point dose measurements using ionization chambers and for surface dose measurements using EBT3 Gafchromic films in post-mastectomy chest wall radiotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.