Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33770348›Full record

ReviewProbiotics and antimicrobial proteins2021

The Role of Mucosal Immunity and Recombinant Probiotics in SARS-CoV2 Vaccine Development.

Shima Moradi-Kalbolandi, Keyvan Majidzadeh-A, Mohadeseh Haji Abdolvahab, Neda Jalili, Leila Farahmand

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Gut distress and interventionFrontiers in public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Effects ofNutrients · 2022
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shima Moradi-KalbolandiRecombinant Proteins Department, Breast Cancer Research Center, Motamed Cancer Institute, ACECR, 1517964311, Tehran, Iran.
Keyvan Majidzadeh-ARecombinant Proteins Department, Breast Cancer Research Center, Motamed Cancer Institute, ACECR, 1517964311, Tehran, Iran.
Mohadeseh Haji AbdolvahabRecombinant Proteins Department, Breast Cancer Research Center, Motamed Cancer Institute, ACECR, 1517964311, Tehran, Iran.
Neda JaliliRecombinant Proteins Department, Breast Cancer Research Center, Motamed Cancer Institute, ACECR, 1517964311, Tehran, Iran.
Leila FarahmandRecombinant Proteins Department, Breast Cancer Research Center, Motamed Cancer Institute, ACECR, 1517964311, Tehran, Iran. laylafarahmand@gmail.com.
Motamed Cancer Institute · IRAcademic Center for Education, Culture and Research · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2), causing the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19), was introduced by WHO (World Health Organization) as "pandemic" in March 2020. According to WHO, thus far (23 November 2020) 58,425,681 infected cases including 1,385,218 deaths have been reported worldwide. In order to reduce transmission and spread of this lethal virus, attempts are globally being made to develop an appropriate vaccine. Intending to neutralize pathogens at their initial entrance site, protective mucosal immunity is inevitably required. In SARS-CoV2 infection and transmission, respiratory mucosa plays a key role; hence, apparently mucosal vaccination could be a superior approach to elicit mucosal and systemic immune responses simultaneously. In this review, the advantages of mucosal vaccination to control COVID-19 infection, limitations, and outcomes of mucosal vaccines have been highlighted. Considering the gut microbiota dysregulation in COVID-19, we further provide evidences on utilization of recombinant probiotics, particularly lactic acid bacteria (LAB) as vaccine carrier. Their intrinsic immunomodulatory features, natural adjuvanticity, and feasible expression of relevant antigen in the mucosal surface make them more appealing as live cell factory. Among all available platforms, bioengineered probiotics are considered as the most affordable, most practical, and safest vaccination approach to halt this emerging virus.

Indexed as

Immunity, MucosalAnimalsCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesDrug DevelopmentGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGene ExpressionHumansLactobacillalesSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 VaccinesBioengineeringCOVID-19Lactic acid bacteria (LAB)Live mucosal vaccineProbioticsSARS-CoV2

Identifiers

PMID33770348
PMCPMC7996120
OpenAlexW3138425278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.