Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33770270›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2021

Efficacy and safety of an artificial dermal graft for the reconstruction of exenterated sockets: a preliminary report.

B Monjanel, S Baillif, J Lagier, L Gastaud, G Poissonnet, Arnaud Martel

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

B MonjanelOphthalmology Department, University Hospital of Nice, Nice, France.
S BaillifOphthalmology Department, University Hospital of Nice, Nice, France.
J LagierOphthalmology Department, University Hospital of Nice, Nice, France.
L GastaudMedical Oncology Department, Centre Antoine Lacassagne (CAL), Nice, France.
G PoissonnetCervico-Facial Surgery Department, Centre Antoine Lacassagne (CAL), Nice, France.
Arnaud MartelOphthalmology Department, University Hospital of Nice, Nice, France. martel.a@chu-nice.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3836-7126
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice · FRCentre Antoine Lacassagne · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study is to report our experience with the use of artificial dermis grafts for orbital socket reconstruction following orbital exenteration (OE).

methodA retrospective study was conducted in our ocular oncology centre from May 2018 to June 2020 in patients undergoing OE for orbital malignancies in whom an artificial dermis device (Integra® template, 2 layers) was used for reconstruction. Data recorded included demographics, previous and adjuvant treatments, aetiologies, surgical procedure, surgical reconstruction, complications and follow-up. The main outcome measure was the time between OE and the full granulation of the cavity.

resultsTen patients (mean age, 71.3 years [43-92]) were included. Tumours originated from the conjunctiva (n = 5, 50%), eyelid (n = 3, 30%) and orbit (n = 2, 20%). Nine patients underwent total OE, and one required enlarged OE. Orbital reconstruction was performed using an artificial dermis alone (n = 9, 90%) or combined with regional flaps (n = 1, 10%). The mean granulation time was 3.3 weeks (2-4). Three (30%) patients received adjuvant radiotherapy 1 month post-surgery. The mean time to spontaneous epithelialization was 9.4 weeks (6-12). Preoperative and postoperative radiotherapy was not associated with a delayed epithelialization of the socket (p = 0.463 and p = 0.236, respectively). One (10%) and 2 (20%) patients experienced postoperative socket infection and an ethmoidal fistula, respectively. The mean follow-up was 11.6 months (6-16).

conclusionUsing artificial dermis grafts alone or with regional flaps appears to be a viable surgical procedure for orbital socket reconstruction. They reduce surgical morbidity and hospital stay. Preoperative and postoperative radiotherapy does not seem to delay socket healing.

Indexed as

Plastic Surgery ProceduresAgedEye, ArtificialHumansOrbitOrbit EviscerationRetrospective StudiesSurgical FlapsArtificial dermisOrbital exenterationRadiotherapySocket reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID33770270
OpenAlexW3139481591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.