Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33770223›Full record

SynthesisAbdominal radiology (New York)2021

Comparison of diffusion-weighted imaging and MR elastography in staging liver fibrosis: a meta-analysis.

Weon Jang, Seongil Jo, Ji Soo Song, Hong Pil Hwang, Seong-Hun Kim

Erratum issuedAbstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. [Expert consensus on MRI diagnosis of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B (version 2023)].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2023
    Article
  5. Clinical Application of Quantitative MR Imaging in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2023
    Review
  6. Clinical Significance of Liver MR Imaging.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Weon JangDepartment of Radiology, Jeonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Korea.
Seongil JoDepartment of Statistics, Inha University, Incheon, Korea.
Ji Soo SongDepartment of Radiology, Jeonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Korea. pichgo@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4264-5320
Hong Pil HwangDepartment of Surgery, Jeonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Korea.
Seong-Hun KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Jeonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), gradient-recalled echo-based magnetic resonance elastography (GRE-MRE), and spin-echo echo-planar imaging-based MRE (SE-EPI-MRE) in liver fibrosis staging.

methodsA systematic literature search was done to collect studies on the performance of DWI, GRE-MRE, and SE-EPI-MRE for diagnosing liver fibrosis. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, positive and negative likelihood ratio, and a summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were estimated with a bivariate random effects model. Subgroup analyses on various study characteristics were performed.

resultsSixty studies with a total of 6620 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of GRE-MRE and SE-EPI-MRE showed high diagnostic accuracy and did not differ significantly. The area under the summary ROC curve for all stages of fibrosis differed significantly between DWI (0.83-0.88) and either GRE-MRE (0.95-0.97) or SE-EPI-MRE (0.95-0.99). Substantial heterogeneity was detected for all three imaging methods.

conclusionsBoth GRE-MRE and SE-EPI-MRE are highly accurate for detection of each liver fibrosis stage, with high potential to replace liver biopsy. Although DWI had a moderate accuracy in distinguishing liver fibrosis, it could be regarded as an alternative to MRE, since it is widely available and easily implemented in routine liver MRI.

Indexed as

Elasticity Imaging TechniquesEcho-Planar ImagingHumansLiverLiver CirrhosisMagnetic Resonance ImagingReproducibility of ResultsDiffusion-weighted imageLiver fibrosisMagnetic resonance elastographyMeta-analysis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.