Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33770124›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Feasibility and potential significance of rapid in vitro qualitative phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli with the ProMax system.

Jade Chen, Michael Tomasek, Amorina Cruz, Matthew L Faron, Dakai Liu, William H Rodgers, Vincent Gau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jade ChenGeneFluidics, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Michael TomasekGeneFluidics, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.
Amorina CruzThe Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8560-9728
Matthew L FaronThe Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States of America.
Dakai LiuDepartment of Pathology and Clinical Laboratories, NewYork-Presbyterian Queens, Flushing, New York, United States of America.
William H RodgersDepartment of Pathology and Clinical Laboratories, NewYork-Presbyterian Queens, Flushing, New York, United States of America.
Vincent GauGeneFluidics, Los Angeles, California, United States of America.

Funding

Safe and Effective Whole Blood ID/AST Device for Use in Neonatal ICU SettingsR44HD084033 · NICHD · GENEFLUIDICS, INC. · PI GAU, VINCENT JEN-JR · 2015 to 2021
$4.6M
A fully integrated CentriFluidic system for direct bloodstream infection PID/ASTR01AI117059 · NIAID · GENEFLUIDICS, INC. · PI GAU, VINCENT JEN-JR · 2015 to 2019
$3.6M
Near patient molecular diagnostics test for infectionsSB1AI088756 · NIAID · GENEFLUIDICS, INC. · PI GAU, VINCENT JEN-JR · 2016 to 2018
$3.0M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI117059NIAID NIH HHS SB1 AI088756NICHD NIH HHS R44 HD084033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence and evolution of antibiotic resistance has been accelerated due to the widespread use of antibiotics and a lack of timely diagnostic tests that guide therapeutic treatment with adequate sensitivity, specificity, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) accuracy. Automated AST instruments are extensively used in clinical microbiology labs and provide a streamlined workflow, simplifying susceptibility testing for pathogenic bacteria isolated from clinical samples. Although currently used commercial systems such as the Vitek2 and BD Phoenix can deliver results in substantially less time than conventional methods, their dependence on traditional AST inoculum concentrations and optical detection limit their speed somewhat. Herein, we describe the GeneFluidics ProMax lab automation system intended for a rapid 3.5-hour molecular AST from clinical isolates. The detection method described utilizes a higher starting inoculum concentration and automated molecular quantification of species-specific 16S rRNA through the use of an electrochemical sensor to assess microbiological responses to antibiotic exposure. A panel of clinical isolates consisting of species of gram-negative rods from the CDC AR bank and two hospitals, New York-Presbyterian Queens and Medical College of Wisconsin, were evaluated against ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, and meropenem in a series of reproducibility and clinical studies. The categorical agreement and reproducibility for Citrobacter freundii, Enterobacter cloacae, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella aerogenes, Klebsiella oxytoca, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were 100% and 100% for ciprofloxacin, 98.7% and 100% for gentamicin and 98.5% and 98.5% for meropenem, respectively.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsGram-Negative BacteriaMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAutomation, LaboratoryFeasibility StudiesPhenotypeAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID33770124
PMCPMC7996979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.