Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33770084›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Improved diagnostic prediction of the pathogenicity of bloodstream isolates of Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Shannon M VanAken, Duane Newton, J Scott VanEpps

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Knowledge, Attitude and Practice RegardingInfectious disease reports · 2022
    Review
  6. Look Who's Talking: Host and Pathogen Drivers ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shannon M VanAkenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America.
Duane NewtonDepartment of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America.
J Scott VanEppsDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0805-0913
University of Michigan · US

Funding

Antimicrobial mechanisms of action zinc oxide nanoparticlesK08AI128006 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI VANEPPS, J SCOTT · 2017 to 2020
$778k
NIAID NIH HHS K08 AI128006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With an estimated 440,000 active cases occurring each year, medical device associated infections pose a significant burden on the US healthcare system, costing about $9.8 billion in 2013. Staphylococcus epidermidis is the most common cause of these device-associated infections, which typically involve isolates that are multi-drug resistant and possess multiple virulence factors. S. epidermidis is also frequently a benign contaminant of otherwise sterile blood cultures. Therefore, tests that distinguish pathogenic from non-pathogenic isolates would improve the accuracy of diagnosis and prevent overuse/misuse of antibiotics. Attempts to use multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) with machine learning for this purpose had poor accuracy (~73%). In this study we sought to improve the diagnostic accuracy of predicting pathogenicity by focusing on phenotypic markers (i.e., antibiotic resistance, growth fitness in human plasma, and biofilm forming capacity) and the presence of specific virulence genes (i.e., mecA, ses1, and sdrF). Commensal isolates from healthy individuals (n = 23), blood culture contaminants (n = 21), and pathogenic isolates considered true bacteremia (n = 54) were used. Multiple machine learning approaches were applied to characterize strains as pathogenic vs non-pathogenic. The combination of phenotypic markers and virulence genes improved the diagnostic accuracy to 82.4% (sensitivity: 84.9% and specificity: 80.9%). Oxacillin resistance was the most important variable followed by growth rate in plasma. This work shows promise for the addition of phenotypic testing in clinical diagnostic applications.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiaBacterial ProteinsBiofilmsDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialHumansMachine LearningMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMultilocus Sequence TypingOxacillinStaphylococcus epidermidisVirulenceAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsMecA protein, Staphylococcus epidermidisOxacillin

Identifiers

PMID33770084
PMCPMC7997010
OpenAlexW3138656478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.