ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2021
Implicit Solvents for the Polarizable Atomic Multipole AMOEBA Force Field.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bayesian Modeling of Polarizable Water: Lessons for Force Field Development.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- TinkerModeller: An Efficient Tool for Building Biological Systems in Tinker Simulations.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- Spatiotemporal characterization of water diffusion anomalies in saline solutions using machine learning force field.Science advances · 2024Article
- Revised 4-Point Water Model for the Classical Drude Oscillator Polarizable Force Field: SWM4-HLJ.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024Article
- Force Field X: A computational microscope to study genetic variation and organic crystals using theory and experiment.The Journal of chemical physics · 2024Article
- A generalized Kirkwood implicit solvent for the polarizable AMOEBA protein model.The Journal of chemical physics · 2023Article
- The Importance of Charge Transfer and Solvent Screening in the Interactions of Backbones and Functional Groups in Amino Acid Residues and Nucleotides.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- CHARMM-GUI Implicit Solvent Modeler for Various Generalized Born Models in Different Simulation Programs.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2022Article
- Automation of AMOEBA polarizable force field for small molecules: Poltype 2.Journal of computational chemistry · 2022Article
- Recent progress in general force fields of small molecules.Current opinion in structural biology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Computational protein design, ab initio protein/RNA folding, and protein-ligand screening can be too computationally demanding for explicit treatment of solvent. For these applications, implicit solvent offers a compelling alternative, which we describe here for the polarizable atomic multipole AMOEBA force field based on three treatments of continuum electrostatics: numerical solutions to the nonlinear and linearized versions of the Poisson-Boltzmann equation (PBE), the domain-decomposition conductor-like screening model (ddCOSMO) approximation to the PBE, and the analytic generalized Kirkwood (GK) approximation. The continuum electrostatics models are combined with a nonpolar estimator based on novel cavitation and dispersion terms. Electrostatic model parameters are numerically optimized using a least-squares style target function based on a library of 103 small-molecule solvation free energy differences. Mean signed errors for the adaptive Poisson-Boltzmann solver (APBS), ddCOSMO, and GK models are 0.05, 0.00, and 0.00 kcal/mol, respectively, while the mean unsigned errors are 0.70, 0.63, and 0.58 kcal/mol, respectively. Validation of the electrostatic response of the resulting implicit solvents, which are available in the Tinker (or Tinker-HP), OpenMM, and Force Field X software packages, is based on comparisons to explicit solvent simulations for a series of proteins and nucleic acids. Overall, the emergence of performative implicit solvent models for polarizable force fields opens the door to their use for folding and design applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.