Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33769667›Full record

ReviewGenes, brain, and behavior2022

Manifestations of domination: Assessments of social dominance in rodents.

Hannah D Fulenwider, Maya A Caruso, Andrey E Ryabinin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, brain, and behavior, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Complex social dominance behavior using a novel platform test is associated with lateral habenula activation in male and female mice.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Behavioral tests for the assessment of social hierarchy in mice.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hannah D FulenwiderDepartment of Behavioral Neuroscience, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2503-7435
Maya A CarusoDepartment of Behavioral Neuroscience, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Andrey E RyabininDepartment of Behavioral Neuroscience, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4662-3775

Funding

BIOLOGICAL BASES OF ALCOHOLISMT32AA007468 · NIAAA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Andrey E Ryabinin · 1987 to 2026
$11.3M
Social_affiliation_and_alcohol_drinking_in_rodentsR01AA019793 · NIAAA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI RYABININ, ANDREY E · 2011 to 2021
$3.1M
Sensitivity and resilience to increased alcohol drinking in males and females following traumatic stressR01AA028680 · NIAAA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI RYABININ, ANDREY E · 2020 to 2024
$1.9M
Rodent model of alcohol related hyperalgesiaR01AA025024 · NIAAA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI HEINRICHER, MARY MAGDALEN, RYABININ, ANDREY E · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA019793NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA025024NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA028680NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA007468
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social hierarchies are ubiquitous features of virtually all animal groups. The varying social ranks of members within these groups have profound effects on both physical and emotional health, with lower-ranked individuals typically being the most adversely affected by their respective ranks. Thus, reliable measures of social dominance in preclinical rodent models are necessary to better understand the effects of an individual's social rank on other behaviors and physiological processes. In this review, we outline the primary methodologies used to assess social dominance in various rodent species: those that are based on analyses of agonistic behaviors, and those that are based on resource competition. In synthesizing this review, we conclude that assays based on resource competition may be better suited to characterize social dominance in a wider variety of rodent species and strains, and in both males and females. Lastly, albeit expectedly, we demonstrate that similarly to many other areas of preclinical research, studies incorporating female subjects are lacking in comparison to those using males. These findings emphasize the need for an increased number of studies assessing social dominance in females to form a more comprehensive understanding of this behavioral phenomenon.

Indexed as

RodentiaSocial DominanceAgonistic BehaviorAnimalsEmotionsFemaleHierarchy, SocialHumansMaleSocial Behavioragonistic behaviorhierarchyresource competitionsocial rank

Identifiers

PMID33769667
PMCPMC8464621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.