Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33769550›Full record

ArticleHistology and histopathology2021

Stroma composition and proliferative activity are related to therapy response in neoadjuvant treated pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Lena Haeberle, Andrea Cacciato Insilla, Anne-Christine Kapp, Katja Steiger, Anna Melissa Schlitter, Björn Konukiewitz, Ihsan Ekin Demir, Helmut Friess, Irene Esposito

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Histology and histopathology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Lena Haeberle *Institute of Pathology, Heinrich Heine University and University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Andrea Cacciato Insilla *Department of Surgical, Medical, Molecular and Critical Care Pathology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Anne-Christine KappDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Hospital of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Katja SteigerInstitute of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Anna Melissa SchlitterInstitute of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Björn KonukiewitzInstitute of Pathology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Ihsan Ekin DemirDepartment of General Surgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, School of Medicine Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Helmut FriessDepartment of General Surgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, School of Medicine Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Irene EspositoInstitute of Pathology, Heinrich Heine University and University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Technical University of Munich · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DEUniversity of Pisa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTumor regression grading (TRG) based on histopathology is the main tool to assess therapy effects after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, reliable markers to distinguish therapy effects from pre-existing tumor features are lacking. The aim of this study was the characterization of PDAC after NAT, focusing on the stroma. MATERIAL AND

methodsTissue samples from patients resected for PDAC after NAT (n=27) were analyzed. TRG was assessed using the Royal North Shore (RNS) system. Stromal composition was evaluated by Movat's stain. Immunohistochemistry (IH) for Ki-67 and five previously established stroma markers (alpha-Crystallin B, alpha-Smooth muscle actin (alpha-SMA), Neurotrophin-3 (NT-3), SPARC and Tenascin C) was also performed. Results were compared with therapy-naïve PDACs (n=10).

resultsMost cases showed a moderate response (RNS 2; 74%), while 15% displayed a poor response (RNS 3), and 11% a good response (RNS 1). No complete response was observed. Poor regression was associated with mucin-rich stroma, while good regression was associated with collagen-rich stroma. Cases with poorer therapy response had significantly higher proliferation. Higher peritumoral staining intensity for alpha-SMA and Tenascin C also showed a trend towards an association with poor regression.

conclusionsSimilar to the stroma in therapy-naïve PDAC, the stroma of PDAC after NAT is heterogeneous. Distinguishing between desmoplastic stroma and therapy-induced fibrosis by single markers is not possible. Movat's pentachrome stain, IH for Ki-67, and to some extent for Tenascin C and alpha-SMA, can help detect poor histopathological response to NAT.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalCell ProliferationChemotherapy, AdjuvantFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm GradingPancreatic NeoplasmsRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeTumor Microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID33769550
OpenAlexW3138238630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.