Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33769511›Full record

Observational studySleep2021

Greatest changes in objective sleep architecture during COVID-19 lockdown in night owls with increased REM sleep.

Jean-Louis Pépin, Sébastien Bailly, Ernest Mordret, Jonathan Gaucher, Renaud Tamisier, Raoua Ben Messaoud, Pierrick J Arnal, Emmanuel Mignot

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Sleep, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Nightmare frequency and nightmare distress during the COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2023
    Article
  11. Impaired procedural memory in narcolepsy type 1.Acta neurologica Scandinavica · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Sleeping in a bubble: factors affecting sleep during New Zealand's COVID-19 lockdown.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jean-Louis PépinHP2 Laboratory, INSERM U1042, University Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Sébastien BaillyHP2 Laboratory, INSERM U1042, University Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Ernest MordretDreem SAS, Science Team, Paris, France.
Jonathan GaucherHP2 Laboratory, INSERM U1042, University Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1654-8009
Renaud TamisierHP2 Laboratory, INSERM U1042, University Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1128-6529
Raoua Ben MessaoudHP2 Laboratory, INSERM U1042, University Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Pierrick J ArnalDreem SAS, Science Team, Paris, France.
Emmanuel MignotCenter for Sleep Sciences and Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Inserm · FRStanford University · US

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-15-IDEX-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectivesThe COVID-19 pandemic has had dramatic effects on society and people's daily habits. In this observational study, we recorded objective data on sleep macro- and microarchitecture repeatedly over several nights before and during the COVID-19 government-imposed lockdown. The main objective was to evaluate changes in patterns of sleep duration and architecture during home confinement using the pre-confinement period as a control.

methodsParticipants were regular users of a sleep-monitoring headband that records, stores, and automatically analyzes physiological data in real time, equivalent to polysomnography. We measured sleep onset duration, total sleep time, duration of sleep stages (N2, N3, and rapid eye movement [REM]), and sleep continuity. Via the user's smartphone application, participants filled in questionnaires on how lockdown changed working hours, eating behavior, and daily life at home. They also filled in the Insomnia Severity Index, reduced Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale questionnaires, allowing us to create selected subgroups.

resultsThe 599 participants were mainly men (71%) of median age 47 (interquartile range: 36-59). Compared to before lockdown, during lockdown individuals slept more overall (mean +3·83 min; SD: ±1.3), had less deep sleep (N3), more light sleep (N2), and longer REM sleep (mean +3·74 min; SD: ±0.8). They exhibited less weekend-specific changes, suggesting less sleep restriction during the week. Changes were most pronounced in individuals reporting eveningness preferences, suggesting relative sleep deprivation in this population and exacerbated sensitivity to societal changes.

conclusionThis unique dataset should help us understand the effects of lockdown on sleep architecture and on our health.

Indexed as

COVID-19Sleep, REMCommunicable Disease ControlHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2SleepchronotypeCOVID-19 lockdownsleep architecturesleep-monitoring headband

Identifiers

PMID33769511
PMCPMC8083638
OpenAlexW3137178958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.