Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33769451›Full record

ArticleRheumatology (Oxford, England)2022

Long-term persistence of rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: an evaluation of the UCL cohort from 1998 to 2020.

Caitlin Norris-Grey, Geraldine Cambridge, Samantha Moore, Venkat Reddy, Maria Leandro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Current and future treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.Journal of rheumatic diseases · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Caitlin Norris-GreyCentre for Rheumatology Research, University College London.
Geraldine CambridgeCentre for Rheumatology Research, University College London.
Samantha MooreUniversity College London Hospitals, UK.
Venkat ReddyCentre for Rheumatology Research, University College London.
Maria LeandroCentre for Rheumatology Research, University College London.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesB cell depletion therapy based on rituximab in patients with RA was pioneered at University College London Hospitals/University College London in 1998. The objective of this study was to evaluate long-term persistence of rituximab and identify factors associated with discontinuation of treatment.

methodsRetrospective review of medical records from all rituximab-treated RA patients followed up in a dedicated clinic (1998-2020). Data collected included gender, disease duration, previous DMARDs, autoantibody status, age and concomitant therapy at first cycle, length of follow-up, and number of cycles. Drug survival and factors associated with drug discontinuation were analysed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, log-rank test and Cox regression analysis.

resultsA total of 404 patients were included. Median disease duration and age at time of first rituximab cycle were 10 and 57 years, respectively. Median total follow-up was 55 months and median number of cycles five. 93.1% of patients were seropositive. Overall, 31.2% of patients stopped rituximab, with the largest reason for discontinuing being primary inefficacy (42.1%). Comparison of Kaplan-Meier curves showed that rituximab drug survival was lower in seronegative patients and in patients who had previously failed at least one biologic DMARD (bDMARD). Cox regression analysis revealed that rituximab discontinuation was associated with a greater number of previous bDMARDs.

conclusionMany patients with RA achieve good control of their disease with repeated cycles of rituximab treatment. The most common reasons for treatment discontinuation were either primary or secondary inefficacy. Patients who were seronegative and who had previously failed other bDMARDs were more at risk of drug discontinuation.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRituximabSurvival RateYoung AdultAntirheumatic AgentsRituximabB cellsbDMARDsdrug survivalrheumatoid arthritisrituximab

Identifiers

PMID33769451
PMCPMC8824421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.