Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33769102›Full record

ReviewPhysiological reviews2021

What's the buzz? The neuroscience and the treatment of tinnitus.

A Henton, T Tzounopoulos

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physiological reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 119 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A Systematic Review on the Genetic Contribution to Tinnitus.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Regional cerebral blood flow correlates with transcriptional and cellular signatures in tinnitus.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. A discrete serotonergic circuit involved in the generation of tinnitus behavior.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Synaptic Properties of Layer 6 Auditory Corticothalamic Inputs in Normal Hearing and Noise-Induced Hearing Loss.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A HentonPittsburgh Hearing Research Center and Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
T TzounopoulosPittsburgh Hearing Research Center and Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Cell-specific Synaptic Plasticity in the Auditory BrainstemR01DC007905 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI TZOUNOPOULOS, THANOS · 2007 to 2021
$6.9M
Cell-specific Synaptic and Intrinsic Plasticity of Auditory Cortical Neurons after Noise ExposureF31DC017635 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI HENTON, AMANDA M · 2018 to 2020
$135k
NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC017635NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC007905
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tinnitus is a pervasive public health issue that affects ∼15% of the United States population. Similar estimates have also been shown on a global scale, with similar prevalence found in Europe, Asia, and Africa. The severity of tinnitus is heterogeneous, ranging from mildly bothersome to extremely disruptive. In the United States, ∼10-20% of individuals who experience tinnitus report symptoms that severely reduce their quality of life. Due to the huge personal and societal burden, in the last 20 yr a concerted effort on basic and clinical research has significantly advanced our understanding and treatment of this disorder. Yet, neither full understanding, nor cure exists. We know that tinnitus is the persistent involuntary phantom percept of internally generated nonverbal indistinct noises and tones, which in most cases is initiated by acquired hearing loss and maintained only when this loss is coupled with distinct neuronal changes in auditory and extra-auditory brain networks. Yet, the exact mechanisms and patterns of neural activity that are necessary and sufficient for the perceptual generation and maintenance of tinnitus remain incompletely understood. Combinations of animal model and human research will be essential in filling these gaps. Nevertheless, the existing progress in investigating the neurophysiological mechanisms has improved current treatment and highlighted novel targets for drug development and clinical trials. The aim of this review is to thoroughly discuss the current state of human and animal tinnitus research, outline current challenges, and highlight new and exciting research opportunities.

Indexed as

NeurosciencesAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHearing LossHumansQuality of LifeTinnituschannelsdrug developmenthearing losssynapsestinnitus

Identifiers

PMID33769102
PMCPMC8576365
OpenAlexW3136711631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.