Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33768965›Full record

ArticleActa radiologica open2021

Prophylactic placement of inferior vena cava filters and the risk of death or venous thromboembolism in severe trauma patients: a retrospective study comparing two hospitals with different approaches.

Thien Trung Tran, Haraldur Bjarnason, Jennifer McDonald, Nils Oddvar Skaga, Damon E Houghton, Brian Kim, Knut Stavem, Nils Einar Kløw

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta radiologica open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Thien Trung TranInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5678-026X
Haraldur BjarnasonDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Jennifer McDonaldDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Nils Oddvar SkagaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Oslo University Hospital Ullevål, Oslo, Norway.
Damon E HoughtonDepartment of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Brian KimDivision of Trauma, Critical Care and General Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Knut StavemInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Nils Einar KløwInstitute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6042-402X
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USOslo University Hospital · NOUniversity of Oslo · NOMayo Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProphylactic use of inferior vena cava filters to prevent pulmonary embolism in trauma is controversial. The practice varies between hospitals and countries, in part due to conflicting evidence and guidelines. PURPOSE: To compare the effects of pulmonary embolism, deep venous thrombosis and mortality in two hospitals using prophylactic inferior vena cava filter placement or prophylactic anticoagulation alone. MATERIAL AND

methodsPatients presenting with severe trauma were recruited from two level-1 trauma centres between January 2008 and December 2013. Recruited patients from an US hospital having prophylactic inferior vena cava filter inserted were compared to a Scandinavian hospital using prophylactic anticoagulation alone. Inclusion criteria were age >15 years, Injury Severity Score >15 and survival >24 h after hospital admission. Patients with venous thromboembolism diagnosed prior to inferior vena cava filter placement were excluded. A Cox proportional hazard regression model was used with adjustment for immortal time bias and predictor variables.

resultsIn total, 951 patients were reviewed, 282 from an US hospital having inferior vena cava filters placed and 669 from a Scandinavian hospital without inferior vena cava filters. The mean age was 45.9 vs. 47.4 years and the mean Injury Severity Score was 29.8 vs. 25.9, respectively. Inferior vena cava filter placement was not associated with the hazard of pulmonary embolism (Hazard ratio=0.43; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.12, 1.45; P=0.17) or mortality (Hazard ratio=1.16; 95% CI 0.70, 1.95; P=0.56). However, an increased rate of deep venous thrombosis was observed with inferior vena cava filters in place (Hazard ratio=3.75; 95% CI 1.68, 8.36; P=0.001).

conclusionIn severely injured trauma patients, prophylactic inferior vena cava filter placement was not associated with pulmonary embolism or mortality. However, inferior vena cava filters were associated with increased rate of deep venous thrombosis.

Indexed as

comparative studiesembolism/thrombosisfilter insertionsoutcomes analysisTraumavena cava

Identifiers

PMID33768965
PMCPMC7952846
OpenAlexW3133821252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.