Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33768450›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2021

Survey of the clinical practice pattern of using sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with gynecological cancers in Japan: the Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology study.

Shinichi Togami, Hiroaki Kobayashi, Hitoshi Niikura, Muneaki Shimada, Nobuyuki Susumu, Tomohito Tanaka, Yoshito Terai, Tomoyuki Nagai, Tsukasa Baba, Hideaki Yahata and 6 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Shinichi TogamiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagoshima University, Sakuragaoka 8-35-1, Kagoshima, 890-8520, Japan.
Hiroaki KobayashiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Kagoshima University, Sakuragaoka 8-35-1, Kagoshima, 890-8520, Japan. hirokoba@m2.kufm.kagoshima-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2491-2189
Hitoshi NiikuraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Hospital Organization Sendai Medical Center, Sendai, Japan.
Muneaki ShimadaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Hospital Organization Sendai Medical Center, Sendai, Japan.
Nobuyuki SusumuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, International University of Health and Welfare, Chiba, Japan.
Tomohito TanakaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan.
Yoshito TeraiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
Tomoyuki NagaiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Tsukasa BabaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iwate Medical University School of Medicine, Morioka, Iwate, Japan.
Hideaki YahataDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Wataru YamagamiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Ken YamaguchiDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Tsuyoshi YamashitaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hakodate Municipal Hospital, Hakodate, Hokkaido, Japan.
Nobuo YaegashiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Hidetaka KatabuchiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Daisuke AokiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kagoshima University · JPKeio University · JPSendai Medical Center · JPTohoku University · JPHakodate National Hospital · JPInternational University of Health and Welfare · JPIwate Medical University · JPKobe University · JPKumamoto University · JPKyoto University · JPKyushu University · JPOsaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSentinel lymph node (SN) biopsy is essential for evaluating survival and minimal treatment-related morbidity associated with cervical, endometrial, and vulvar cancer in Japan. As such, our aim in this study was to evaluate the current practice pattern of using SN biopsy for cervical, endometrial, and vulvar cancer in Japan.

methodsWe deployed a 47-question survey on the use of SN biopsy for gynecological cancers to 216 gynecological oncology training facilities. The survey included information on the use of SN biopsy for uterine (cervical and endometrial) and vulvar cancers; details on the type, timing, and concentration of tracers used; surgical approach used for SN biopsy; method of biopsy and pathological examination; and facilities' experience with clinical research on SN biopsy.

resultsThe response rate was 84% (181/216), with 40 facilities (22%) having experience in SN biopsy for gynecological cancers, 34 (85%) for uterine cancers, and 15 (37%) for vulvar cancers. Radioisotope, indocyanine green (ICG), and blue dyes were available for the detection of uterine cancers in 21 (52%), 25 (62%), and 19 (48%) facilities and for vulvar cancers in 9 (22%), 3 (7%), and 11 (27%) facilities, respectively. Thirty-four facilities (85%) used intraoperative frozen section procedure for diagnosis when possible, with 24 (71%) of these facilities using 2-mm specimen cuts. Diagnosis included pathological examination (85%), immunostaining (57%), and one-step nucleic acid amplification (5%).

conclusionIncreasing research evidence, providing insurance coverage for radioisotope tracers, and increasing the availability of training are expected to increase the use of SN biopsy in Japan.

Indexed as

Cervical cancerEndometrial cancerSentinel lymph node biopsySurveyVulvar cancer

Identifiers

PMID33768450
OpenAlexW3139117905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.