ArticleBrain topography2022
Slow Resting State Fluctuations Enhance Neuronal and Behavioral Responses to Looming Sounds.
Article in Brain topography, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- What Constitutes the Personal Space in Schizophrenia? Converging Subjective Experience, Brain, and Social Environment.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2025Article
- Auditory inputs modulate intrinsic neuronal timescales during sleep.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Probing Intrinsic Neural Timescales in EEG with an Information-Theory Inspired Approach: Permutation Entropy Time Delay Estimation (PE-TD).Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A Roadmap for Computational Modelling of M/EEG.Brain topography · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
We investigate both experimentally and using a computational model how the power of the electroencephalogram (EEG) recorded in human subjects tracks the presentation of sounds with acoustic intensities that increase exponentially (looming) or remain constant (flat). We focus on the link between this EEG tracking response, behavioral reaction times and the time scale of fluctuations in the resting state, which show considerable inter-subject variability. Looming sounds are shown to generally elicit a sustained power increase in the alpha and beta frequency bands. In contrast, flat sounds only elicit a transient upsurge at frequencies ranging from 7 to 45 Hz. Likewise, reaction times (RTs) in an audio-tactile task at different latencies from sound onset also present significant differences between sound types. RTs decrease with increasing looming intensities, i.e. as the sense of urgency increases, but remain constant with stationary flat intensities. We define the reaction time variation or "gain" during looming sound presentation, and show that higher RT gains are associated with stronger correlations between EEG power responses and sound intensity. Higher RT gain further entails higher relative power differences between loom and flat in the alpha and beta bands. The full-width-at-half-maximum of the autocorrelation function of the eyes-closed resting state EEG also increases with RT gain. The effects are topographically located over the central and frontal electrodes. A computational model reveals that the increase in stimulus-response correlation in subjects with slower resting state fluctuations is expected when EEG power fluctuations at each electrode and in a given band are viewed as simple coupled low-pass filtered noise processes jointly driven by the sound intensity. The model assumes that the strength of stimulus-power coupling is proportional to RT gain in different coupling scenarios, suggesting a mechanism by which slower resting state fluctuations enhance EEG response and shorten reaction times.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.