Trial reportThe AAPS journal2021
Can Pharmacokinetic Studies Assess the Pulmonary Fate of Dry Powder Inhaler Formulations of Fluticasone Propionate?
Trial report in The AAPS journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Relative Bioavailability of Inhaled Fluticasone Propionate and Salmeterol - is Population Pharmacokinetic Modelling a Relevant Alternative to a Non-Compartmental Approach?Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Trial
- Using Lung Regional Deposition Modeling as Model-Integrated Evidence for Locally Acting Orally Inhaled Drug Products.Pharmaceutical research · 2025Review
- Mechanistic Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Dry Powder and Nebulized Formulations of Orally Inhaled TMEM16A Potentiator GDC-6988.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2025Article
- iBCS: 4. Application of the Inhalation Biopharmaceutics Classification System to the Development of Orally Inhaled Drug Products.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2025Review
- Central and peripheral lung deposition of fluticasone propionate dry powder inhaler formulations in humans characterized by population pharmacokinetics.Pharmaceutical research · 2023Article
- Mechanistic modeling of generic orally inhaled drug products: A workshop summary report.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2023Review
- Advancements in the Design and Development of Dry Powder Inhalers and Potential Implications for Generic Development.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Effect of MDI Actuation Timing on Inhalation Dosimetry in a Human Respiratory Tract Model.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Optimization of the TranswellPharmaceutics · 2021Article
- Innovating on Inhaled Bioequivalence: A Critical Analysis of the Current Limitations, Potential Solutions and Stakeholders of the Process.Pharmaceutics · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
28 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
In the context of streamlining generic approval, this study assessed whether pharmacokinetics (PK) could elucidate the pulmonary fate of orally inhaled drug products (OIDPs). Three fluticasone propionate (FP) dry powder inhaler (DPI) formulations (A-4.5, B-3.8, and C-3.7), differing only in type and composition of lactose fines, exhibited median mass aerodynamic diameter (MMAD) of 4.5 μm (A-4.5), 3.8 μm (B-3.8), and 3.7 μm (C-3.7) and varied in dissolution rates (A-4.5 slower than B-3.8 and C-3.7). In vitro total lung dose (TLD
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.