Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33768356›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of implant dentistry2021

Retrospective study of alveolar ridge preservation compared with no alveolar ridge preservation in periodontally compromised extraction sockets.

Jungwon Lee, Junseob Yun, Jung-Ju Kim, Ki-Tae Koo, Yang-Jo Seol, Yong-Moo Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of implant dentistry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jungwon Lee *One-Stop Specialty Center, Seoul National University Dental Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Junseob Yun *Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jung-Ju KimDepartment of Periodontology, School of Dentistry and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ki-Tae KooDepartment of Periodontology, School of Dentistry and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yang-Jo SeolDepartment of Periodontology, School of Dentistry and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Yong-Moo LeeDepartment of Periodontology, School of Dentistry and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. ymlee@snu.ac.kr.ORCID 0000-0002-5619-3847

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo minimize alveolar bone resorption, alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) has been proposed. Recently, interest in improving the feasibility of implant placement has gradually increased, especially in situations of infection such as periodontal and/or endodontic lesions. The aim of this study was to investigate if ARP improves feasibility of implant placement compared with no ARP in periodontally compromised sites. Secondary endpoints were the necessity of bone graft at the time of implant placement and implant failure before loading at ARP compared with no ARP. MATERIAL AND

methodsThis retrospective study was performed using dental records and radiographs obtained from patients who underwent tooth extraction due to chronic periodontal pathology. Outcomes including the feasibility of implant placement, horizontal bone augmentation, vertical bone augmentation, sinus floor elevation, total bone augmentation at the time of implant placement, and implant failure before loading were investigated. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the influence of multiple variables on the clinical outcomes.

resultsIn total, 418 extraction sites (171 without ARP and 247 with ARP) in 287 patients were included in this study. The ARP group (0.8%) shows significantly lower implant placement infeasibility than the no ARP group (4.7%). Horizontal and vertical bone augmentations were significantly influenced by location and no ARP. Total bone augmentation was significantly influenced by sex, location, and no ARP.

conclusionARP in periodontally compromised sites may improve the feasibility of implant placement. In addition, ARP attenuate the severity of the bone augmentation procedure.

Indexed as

Alveolar Ridge AugmentationSinus Floor AugmentationAlveolar ProcessHumansRetrospective StudiesTooth SocketBone regenerationBone substitutesClinical researchClinical trialsGuided tissue regeneration

Identifiers

PMID33768356
PMCPMC7994480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.