Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33768297›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2021

Galactorrhea during antipsychotic treatment: results from AMSP, a drug surveillance program, between 1993 and 2015.

C Glocker, R Grohmann, R Engel, J Seifert, S Bleich, S Stübner, S Toto, C Schüle

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

C GlockerDepartment of Psychiatry und Psychotherapy, Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie der LMU München, LMU Klinikum, Nußbaumstraße 7, 80336, Munich, Germany. Catherine.Glocker@med.uni-muenchen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0821-8533
R GrohmannDepartment of Psychiatry und Psychotherapy, Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie der LMU München, LMU Klinikum, Nußbaumstraße 7, 80336, Munich, Germany.
R EngelDepartment of Psychiatry und Psychotherapy, Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie der LMU München, LMU Klinikum, Nußbaumstraße 7, 80336, Munich, Germany.
J SeifertDepartment of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
S BleichDepartment of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
S StübnerDepartment of Forensic Psychiatry, Bezirksklinikum Ansbach, Feuchtwanger Str. 38, 91522, Ansbach, Germany.
S TotoDepartment of Psychiatry, Social Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
C SchüleDepartment of Psychiatry und Psychotherapy, Klinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie der LMU München, LMU Klinikum, Nußbaumstraße 7, 80336, Munich, Germany.
LMU Klinikum · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Galactorrhea is a well-known adverse drug reaction (ADR) of numerous antipsychotic drugs (APD) and is often distressing for those affected. Methodological problems in the existing literature make it difficult to determine the prevalence of symptomatic hyperprolactinemia in persons treated with APDs. Consequently, a large sample of patients exposed to APDs is needed for more extensive evaluation. Data on APD utilization and reports of galactorrhea caused by APDs were analyzed using data from an observational pharmacovigilance program in German-speaking countries-Arzneimittelsicherheit in der Psychiatrie (AMSP)-from 1993 to 2015. 320,383 patients (175,884 female inpatients) under surveillance were treated with APDs for schizophrenia and other indications. A total of 170 events of galactorrhea caused by APDs were identified (0.97 cases in 1000 female inpatient admissions). Most cases occurred during the reproductive age with the highest incidence among patients between 16 and 30 years (3.81 cases in 1000 inpatients). The APDs that were most frequently imputed alone for inducing galactorrhea were risperidone (52 cases and 0.19% of all exposed inpatients), amisulpride (30 resp. 0.48%), and olanzapine (13 resp. 0.05%). In three cases, quetiapine had a prominent role as a probable cause for galactorrhea. High dosages of the imputed APDs correlated with higher rates of galactorrhea. Galactorrhea is a severe and underestimated condition in psychopharmacology. While some APDs are more likely to cause galactorrhea, we identified a few unusual cases. This highlights the importance of alertness in clinical practice and of taking a patient's individual situation into consideration.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsGalactorrheaAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansPharmacovigilanceYoung AdultAntipsychotic AgentsAdverse drug reactionsAMSP programAntipsychotic drugsGalactorrheaPsychiatric inpatients

Identifiers

PMID33768297
PMCPMC8563638
OpenAlexW3136306077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.