ArticleEuropean radiology2021
Precise whole liver automatic segmentation and quantification of PDFF and R2* on MR images.
Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Liver Segment and Lesion Segmentation on CT and MRI: An Open-Source Contribution to TotalSegmentator.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Spatial characterization of intrahepatic fat deposition across steatotic liver disease subcategories: a multicenter study.BMC medicine · 2026Article
- Digital pathology and lipid droplet size as a key determinant of discrepancies between histology and MRI gradings in steatotic liver disease.European radiology · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based system to predict hepatocellular carcinoma resection volume using contrast-enhanced CT.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Impact of hepatic vessels on whole liver proton density fat fraction and R2* quantification.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
- Reliability of Whole-Liver Liver-Fat-Quantification Between Deep Learning-Accelerated and Standard Volumetric Interpolated Breath-hold Examination Dixon Sequences in a Prospective Oncology Cohort.Investigative radiology · 2025Article
- Development and Validation of a Modality-Invariant 3D Swin U-Net Transformer for Liver and Spleen Segmentation on Multi-Site Clinical Bi-parametric MR Images.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- State-of-the-Art Quantification of Liver Iron With MRI-Vendor Implementation and Available Tools.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Review
- Application and research progress of magnetic resonance proton density fat fraction in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: a comprehensive review.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Review
- Automated MRI liver segmentation for anatomical segmentation, liver volumetry, and the extraction of radiomics.European radiology · 2024Article
- Liver Transplant in Patients with Hepatocarcinoma: Imaging Guidelines and Future Perspectives Using Artificial Intelligence.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Independent Validation of a Deep Learning nnU-Net Tool for Neuroblastoma Detection and Segmentation in MR Images.Cancers · 2023Article
- A systematic review on application of deep learning in digestive system image processing.The Visual computer · 2023Review
- Standardised lesion segmentation for imaging biomarker quantitation: a consensus recommendation from ESR and EORTC.Insights into imaging · 2022Article
- Body fat compartment determination by encoder-decoder convolutional neural network: application to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Quantification of Fat Metaplasia in the Sacroiliac Joints of Patients With Axial Spondyloarthritis by Chemical Shift-Encoded MRI: A Diagnostic Trial.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo automate the segmentation of whole liver parenchyma on multi-echo chemical shift encoded (MECSE) MR examinations using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to seamlessly quantify precise organ-related imaging biomarkers such as the fat fraction and iron load.
methodsA retrospective multicenter collection of 183 MECSE liver MR examinations was conducted. An encoder-decoder CNN was trained (107 studies) following a 5-fold cross-validation strategy to improve the model performance and ensure lack of overfitting. Proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and R2* were quantified on both manual and CNN segmentation masks. Different metrics were used to evaluate the CNN performance over both unseen internal (46 studies) and external (29 studies) validation datasets to analyze reproducibility.
resultsThe internal test showed excellent results for the automatic segmentation with a dice coefficient (DC) of 0.93 ± 0.03 and high correlation between the quantification done with the predicted mask and the manual segmentation (rPDFF = 1 and rR2* = 1; p values < 0.001). The external validation was also excellent with a different vendor but the same magnetic field strength, proving the generalization of the model to other manufacturers with DC of 0.94 ± 0.02. Results were lower for the 1.5-T MR same vendor scanner with DC of 0.87 ± 0.06. Both external validations showed high correlation in the quantification (rPDFF = 1 and rR2* = 1; p values < 0.001). In both internal and external validation datasets, the relative error for the PDFF and R2* quantification was below 4% and 1% respectively.
conclusionLiver parenchyma can be accurately segmented with CNN in a vendor-neutral virtual approach, allowing to obtain reproducible automatic whole organ virtual biopsies. KEY POINTS: • Whole liver parenchyma can be automatically segmented using convolutional neural networks. • Deep learning allows the creation of automatic pipelines for the precise quantification of liver-related imaging biomarkers such as PDFF and R2*. • MR "virtual biopsy" can become a fast and automatic procedure for the assessment of chronic diffuse liver diseases in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33768292What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.