Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33768292›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2021

Precise whole liver automatic segmentation and quantification of PDFF and R2* on MR images.

Ana Jimenez-Pastor, Angel Alberich-Bayarri, Rafael Lopez-Gonzalez, David Marti-Aguado, Manuela França, Rodrigo San Martin Bachmann, Juan Mazzucco, Luis Marti-Bonmati

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ana Jimenez-PastorQuantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, QUIBIM S.L, Aragon Avenue, 30, 13th floor, Office J, 46021, Valencia, Spain. anajimenez@quibim.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0978-9429
Angel Alberich-BayarriQuantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, QUIBIM S.L, Aragon Avenue, 30, 13th floor, Office J, 46021, Valencia, Spain.
Rafael Lopez-GonzalezQuantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine, QUIBIM S.L, Aragon Avenue, 30, 13th floor, Office J, 46021, Valencia, Spain.
David Marti-AguadoDigestive Disease Department, Clinic University Hospital, INCLIVA Health Research Institute, Valencia, Spain.
Manuela FrançaRadiology Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto (CHUP), Porto, Portugal.
Rodrigo San Martin BachmannLaboratorio Clinico Diagnomed, Concepción, Chile.
Juan MazzuccoARGUS Diagnostico Medico, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Luis Marti-BonmatiBiomedical Imaging Research Group (GIBI230-PREBI) at La Fe Health Research Institute, and Imaging La Fe node at Distributed Network for Biomedical Imaging (ReDIB) Unique Scientific and Technical Infrastructures (ICTS), Valencia, Spain.

Funding

Gilead Sciences GLD19/00050Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI19/0380
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo automate the segmentation of whole liver parenchyma on multi-echo chemical shift encoded (MECSE) MR examinations using convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to seamlessly quantify precise organ-related imaging biomarkers such as the fat fraction and iron load.

methodsA retrospective multicenter collection of 183 MECSE liver MR examinations was conducted. An encoder-decoder CNN was trained (107 studies) following a 5-fold cross-validation strategy to improve the model performance and ensure lack of overfitting. Proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and R2* were quantified on both manual and CNN segmentation masks. Different metrics were used to evaluate the CNN performance over both unseen internal (46 studies) and external (29 studies) validation datasets to analyze reproducibility.

resultsThe internal test showed excellent results for the automatic segmentation with a dice coefficient (DC) of 0.93 ± 0.03 and high correlation between the quantification done with the predicted mask and the manual segmentation (rPDFF = 1 and rR2* = 1; p values < 0.001). The external validation was also excellent with a different vendor but the same magnetic field strength, proving the generalization of the model to other manufacturers with DC of 0.94 ± 0.02. Results were lower for the 1.5-T MR same vendor scanner with DC of 0.87 ± 0.06. Both external validations showed high correlation in the quantification (rPDFF = 1 and rR2* = 1; p values < 0.001). In both internal and external validation datasets, the relative error for the PDFF and R2* quantification was below 4% and 1% respectively.

conclusionLiver parenchyma can be accurately segmented with CNN in a vendor-neutral virtual approach, allowing to obtain reproducible automatic whole organ virtual biopsies. KEY POINTS: • Whole liver parenchyma can be automatically segmented using convolutional neural networks. • Deep learning allows the creation of automatic pipelines for the precise quantification of liver-related imaging biomarkers such as PDFF and R2*. • MR "virtual biopsy" can become a fast and automatic procedure for the assessment of chronic diffuse liver diseases in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingProtonsHumansLiverReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesProtonsBiomarkersIron overloadMagnetic resonance imagingNeural network modelsNon-alcoholic fatty liver disease

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.