Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33768287›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2021

A diagnostic model for differentiating tuberculous spondylitis from pyogenic spondylitis on computed tomography images.

Xiaoyang Liu, Meimei Zheng, Jianmin Sun, Xingang Cui

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Development and validation of a nomogram for differential diagnosis of pyogenic spondylitis and tuberculous spondylitis in China: a multicenter retrospective study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Multimodal imaging fusion and machine learning model development: differential diagnosis of spinal inflammatory lesions using combined CT hounsfield units and MRI features.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. An imaging-based clinical prediction model to differentiate brucellar spondylitis from pyogenic spondylitis: a multicenter retrospective observational study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Observational
  9. Article
  10. Differentiation of typical features between Fungal spondylitis and Brucellar spondylitis on CT and new applications of CT values in diagnosis of spinal infections.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A diagnostic model for differentiating tuberculous spondylodiscitis from pyogenic spondylodiscitis based on pathogen-confirmed patients.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  14. [Pott's disease, surgical case series and literature review].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2024
    Review
  15. Differentiation of Native Vertebral Osteomyelitis: A Comprehensive Review of Imaging Techniques and Future Applications.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. [First SADI-S in the Mexican Institute of Social Security].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xiaoyang LiuDepartment of Spine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, No. 9677 in Jingshi Road, Jinan City, China.
Meimei ZhengDepartment of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan, China.
Jianmin SunDepartment of Spine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, No. 9677 in Jingshi Road, Jinan City, China.
Xingang CuiDepartment of Spine, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, No. 9677 in Jingshi Road, Jinan City, China. spine2014@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4252-5222

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop and evaluate a logistics regression diagnostic model based on computer tomography (CT) features to differentiate tuberculous spondylitis (TS) from pyogenic spondylitis (PS).

methodsDemographic and clinical features were collected from the Electronic Medical Record System. Data of bony changes seen on CT images were compared between the PS (n = 61) and TS (n = 51) groups using the chi-squared test or t test. Based on features that were identified to be significant, a diagnostic model was developed from a derivation set (two thirds) and evaluated in a validation set (one third). The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were calculated.

resultsThe width of bone formation around the vertebra and sequestrum was greater in the TS group. There were significant differences between the two groups in the horizontal and longitudinal location of erosion and the morphology of axial bone destruction and sagittal residual vertebra. Kyphotic deformity and overlapping vertebrae were more common in the TS group. A diagnostic model that included eight predictors was developed and simplified to include the following six predictors: width of the bone formation surrounding the vertebra, longitudinal location, axial-specific erosive morphology, specific morphology of the residual vertebra, kyphotic deformity, and overlapping vertebrae. The simplified model showed good sensitivity, specificity, and total accuracy (85.59%, 87.80%, and 86.50%, respectively); the AUC was 0.95, indicating good clinical predictive ability.

conclusionsA diagnostic model based on bone destruction and formation seen on CT images can facilitate clinical differentiation of TS from PS. KEY POINTS: • We have developed and validated a simple diagnostic model based on bone destruction and formation observed on CT images that can differentiate tuberculous spondylitis from pyogenic spondylitis. • The model includes six predictors: width of the bone formation surrounding the vertebra, longitudinal location, axial-specific erosive morphology, specific morphology of the residual vertebra, kyphotic deformity, and overlapping vertebrae. • The simplified model has good sensitivity, specificity, and total accuracy with a high AUC, indicating excellent predictive ability.

Indexed as

SpondylitisTuberculosis, SpinalHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedDiagnosisRadiologySpineSpondylitisTuberculosis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.