Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33768220›Full record

ArticleHeterogenous data management, polystores, and analytics for healthcare : VLDB Workshops, Poly 2020 and DMAH 2020 virtual event, August 31 and September 4, 2020 : revised selected papers2021

Parameter Sensitivity Analysis for the Progressive Sampling-Based Bayesian Optimization Method for Automated Machine Learning Model Selection.

Weipeng Zhou, Gang Luo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heterogenous data management, polystores, and analytics for healthcare : VLDB Workshops, Poly 2020 and DMAH 2020 virtual event, August 31 and September 4, 2020 : revised selected papers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Weipeng ZhouUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1215-8043
Gang LuoUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7217-4008

Funding

Using Computational Approaches to Optimize Asthma Care ManagementR01HL142503 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LUO, GANG · 2018 to 2021
$3.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL142503
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a key component of automating the entire process of applying machine learning to solve real-world problems, automated machine learning model selection is in great need. Many automated methods have been proposed for machine learning model selection, but their inefficiency poses a major problem for handling large data sets. To expedite automated machine learning model selection and lower its resource requirements, we developed a progressive sampling-based Bayesian optimization (PSBO) method to efficiently automate the selection of machine learning algorithms and hyper-parameter values. Our PSBO method showed good performance in our previous tests and has 20 parameters. Each parameter has its own default value and impacts our PSBO method's performance. It is unclear for each of these parameters, how much room for improvement there is over its default value, how sensitive our PSBO method's performance is to it, and what its safe range is. In this paper, we perform a sensitivity analysis of these 20 parameters to answer these questions. Our results show that these parameters' default values work well. There is not much room for improvement over them. Also, each of these parameters has a reasonably large safe range, within which our PSBO method's performance is insensitive to parameter value changes.

Indexed as

Automated machine learning model selectionBayesian optimizationProgressive samplingSensitivity analysis

Identifiers

PMID33768220
PMCPMC7990322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.