Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33768211›Full record

ArticleCurrent research in toxicology2021

CTD Anatomy: analyzing chemical-induced phenotypes and exposures from an anatomical perspective, with implications for environmental health studies.

Allan Peter Davis, Thomas C Wiegers, Jolene Wiegers, Cynthia J Grondin, Robin J Johnson, Daniela Sciaky, Carolyn J Mattingly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current research in toxicology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Construction of predictive ceRNA network and identification of the patterns of immune cells infiltrated in GravesZhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Allan Peter DavisDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695.
Thomas C WiegersDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695.
Jolene WiegersDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695.
Cynthia J GrondinDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695.
Robin J JohnsonDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695.
Daniela SciakyDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695.
Carolyn J MattinglyDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695.

Funding

The Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD)R01ES014065 · NIEHS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI DAVIS, ALLAN PETER, MATTINGLY, CAROLYN J. · 2006 to 2021
$10.5M
Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD)U24ES033155 · NIEHS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI Allan Peter Davis, Carolyn J. Mattingly · 2021 to 2026
$9.3M
Advancing mechanism-based studies with cross-species chemical-phenotype dataR01ES023788 · NIEHS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI MATTINGLY, CAROLYN J. · 2015 to 2019
$1.6M
Generation of a centralized and integrated resource for exposure dataR01ES019604 · NIEHS · NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY RALEIGH · PI MATTINGLY, CAROLYN J. · 2011 to 2015
$1.3M
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES014065NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES019604NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES023788NIEHS NIH HHS U24 ES033155
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD) is a freely available public resource that curates and interrelates chemical, gene/protein, phenotype, disease, organism, and exposure data. CTD can be used to address toxicological mechanisms for environmental chemicals and facilitate the generation of testable hypotheses about how exposures affect human health. At CTD, manually curated interactions for chemical-induced phenotypes are enhanced with anatomy terms (tissues, fluids, and cell types) to describe the physiological system of the reported event. These same anatomy terms are used to annotate the human media (e.g., urine, hair, nail, blood, etc.) in which an environmental chemical was assayed for exposure. Currently, CTD uses more than 880 unique anatomy terms to contextualize over 255,000 chemical-phenotype interactions and 167,000 exposure statements. These annotations allow chemical-phenotype interactions and exposure data to be explored from a novel, anatomical perspective. Here, we describe CTD's anatomy curation process (including the construction of a controlled, interoperable vocabulary) and new anatomy webpages (that coalesce and organize the curated chemical-phenotype and exposure data sets). We also provide examples that demonstrate how this feature can be used to identify system- and cell-specific chemical-induced toxicities, help inform exposure data, prioritize phenotypes for environmental diseases, survey tissue and pregnancy exposomes, and facilitate data connections with external resources. Anatomy annotations advance understanding of environmental health by providing new ways to explore and survey chemical-induced events and exposure studies in the CTD framework.

Indexed as

anatomychemicaldatabasediseaseenvironmental healthphenotype

Identifiers

PMID33768211
PMCPMC7990325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.