ArticleHeliyon2021
Human factor, a critical weak point in the information security of an organization's Internet of things.
Article in Heliyon, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Systematic Review on Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Electronic Information Security in Mobile Networks.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Pooled it
- Sufficiency for PSS tracking gait disorders in multiple sclerosis: A managerial perspective.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Article
- Risk management in digitalized educational environments: Teachers' information security awareness levels.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Internet of Things (IoT) presents opportunities for designing new technologies for organizations. Many organizations are beginning to accept these technologies for their daily work, where employees can be connected, both on the organization's premises and the "outside", for business continuity. However, organizations continue to experience data breach incidents. Even though there is a plethora of researches in Information Security, there "seems" to be little or lack of interest from the research community, when it comes to human factors and its relationship to data breach incidents. The focus is usually on the technological component of Information Technology systems. Regardless of any technological solutions introduced, human factors continue to be an area that lacks the required attention. Making the assumption that people will follow expected secure behavioral patterns and therefore system security expectations will be satisfied, may not necessarily be true. Security is not something that can simply be purchased; human factors will always prove to be an important space to explore. Hence, human factors are without a doubt a critical point in Information Security. In this study, we propose an Organizational Information Security Framework For Human Factors applicable to the Internet of Things, which includes countermeasures that can help prevent or reduce data breach incidents as a result of human factors. Using linear regression on data breach incidents reported in the United States of America from 2009 to 2017, the study validates human factors as a weak-point in information security that can be extended to Internet of Things by predicting the relationship between human factors and data breach incidents, and the strength of these relationships. Our results show that five breach incidents out of the seven typified human factors to statistically and significantly predict data breach incidents. Furthermore, the results also show a positive correlation between human factors and these data breach incidents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.