Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33768147›Full record

ArticleMedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources2021

Words Matter: An Antibias Workshop for Health Care Professionals to Reduce Stigmatizing Language.

Julia Raney, Ria Pal, Tiffany Lee, Samuel Ricardo Saenz, Devika Bhushan, Peter Leahy, Carrie Johnson, Cynthia Kapphahn, Michael A Gisondi, Kim Hoang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. COSMIN systematic review of stigma measurement in smoking, COPD, and lung cancer: content analysis, language audit, and psychometrics.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. From language matters to stigma-free communication in diabetes: Evolution, challenges, and next steps.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Transmission of negative biases through social commentary included in neonatal intensive care unit progress notes.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Julia RaneyResident, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine.ORCID 0000-0001-8579-9744
Ria PalResident, Division of Child Neurology, Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine.
Tiffany LeeFellow, Department of Anesthesia, Stanford University School of Medicine.
Samuel Ricardo SaenzResident, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine.
Devika BhushanChief Medical Officer, California Office of the Surgeon General.
Peter LeahyAssistant Professor, Division of Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, Cook Children's Health Care System.
Carrie JohnsonStanford Pediatrics Residency Education Manager, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine.
Cynthia KapphahnClinical Professor, Division of Adolescent Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine.
Michael A GisondiAssociate Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine.
Kim HoangAssistant Professor, Division of Pediatric Hospital Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Biased language influences health care providers' perceptions of patients, impacts their clinical care, and prevents vulnerable populations from seeking treatment. Training clinicians to systematically replace biased verbal and written language is an essential step to providing equitable care. Methods: We designed and implemented an interactive workshop to teach health care professionals a framework to identify and replace stigmatizing language in clinical practice. The workshop included a reflective exercise, role-play, brief didactic session, and case-based discussion. We developed the program for a broad target audience of providers and initially delivered it at three academic conferences. We used descriptive statistics to analyze Likert-style items on course evaluations and identified themes in open-text responses. Results: A total of 66 participants completed course evaluations; most believed the workshop met its objectives (4.8 out of 5.0) and strongly agreed that they would apply skills learned (4.8). Participants planned to incorporate reflection into their verbal and written language. Potential barriers to applying course content included perceived difficulty in changing entrenched practice habits, burnout, and fatigue. Suggestions for improvement included more time for group discussions and strategies to teach skills to colleagues. Discussion: Participants found the course material highly engaging and relevant to their clinical practice. Learners left the workshop feeling motivated to engage in more mindful word choice and to share key concepts with their colleagues.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelLanguageHumansLearningSurveys and QuestionnairesAnti-racismBiasCase-Based LearningCommunication SkillsCultural CompetenceDiversityHealth DisparitiesHealth EquityInclusionLanguageProfessionalism

Identifiers

PMID33768147
PMCPMC7970642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.