Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33768134›Full record

ReviewJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2021

Radiomic and radiogenomic modeling for radiotherapy: strategies, pitfalls, and challenges.

James T T Coates, Giacomo Pirovano, Issam El Naqa

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. The impact of radiogenomics on breast cancer.American journal of cancer research · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

James T T CoatesMassachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Center for Cancer Research, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4908-0975
Giacomo PirovanoMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Radiology, New York, New York, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8862-3613
Issam El NaqaMoffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Department of Machine Learning, Tampa, Florida, United States.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Combined radiation acoustics and ultrasound imaging for real-time guidance in radiotherapyR37CA222215 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI EL NAQA, ISSAM M. · 2018 to 2024
$3.5M
Optimal Decision Making in Radiotherapy Using Panomics AnalyticsR01CA233487 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI EL NAQA, ISSAM M. · 2019 to 2023
$2.4M
Cerenkov Multi-Spectral Imaging (CMSI) for Adaptation and Real-Time Imaging in RadiotherapyR41CA243722 · NCI · ENDECTRA, LLC · PI EL NAQA, ISSAM M. · 2020 to 2020
$327k
CCTN-CONTRACEPTIVE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM-NICHD CONTRACEPTIVE CLINICAL TRIALS NETWORK-FEMALE SITES-CORE FUNCTION ACTIVITIES75N94020D00018 · NICHD · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI CHEN, M.D., MPH, BEATRICE · 2020 to 2025
$40k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA233487NCI NIH HHS R37 CA222215NCI NIH HHS R41 CA243722NHLBI NIH HHS 75N92022D00018NHLBI NIH HHS 75N92023D00018NICHD NIH HHS 75N94020D00018ORFDO NIH HHS 75N99020D00018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The power of predictive modeling for radiotherapy outcomes has historically been limited by an inability to adequately capture patient-specific variabilities; however, next-generation platforms together with imaging technologies and powerful bioinformatic tools have facilitated strategies and provided optimism. Integrating clinical, biological, imaging, and treatment-specific data for more accurate prediction of tumor control probabilities or risk of radiation-induced side effects are high-dimensional problems whose solutions could have widespread benefits to a diverse patient population-we discuss technical approaches toward this objective. Increasing interest in the above is specifically reflected by the emergence of two nascent fields, which are distinct but complementary: radiogenomics, which broadly seeks to integrate biological risk factors together with treatment and diagnostic information to generate individualized patient risk profiles, and radiomics, which further leverages large-scale imaging correlates and extracted features for the same purpose. We review classical analytical and data-driven approaches for outcomes prediction that serve as antecedents to both radiomic and radiogenomic strategies. Discussion then focuses on uses of conventional and deep machine learning in radiomics. We further consider promising strategies for the harmonization of high-dimensional, heterogeneous multiomics datasets (panomics) and techniques for nonparametric validation of best-fit models. Strategies to overcome common pitfalls that are unique to data-intensive radiomics are also discussed.

Indexed as

outcomespredictive modelingradiogenomicsradiomicsradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID33768134
PMCPMC7985651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.