Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33767831›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2021

Analysing detection gaps in acoustic telemetry data to infer differential movement patterns in fish.

Michael J Williamson, Emma J Tebbs, Terence P Dawson, David J Curnick, Francesco Ferretti, Aaron B Carlisle, Taylor K Chapple, Robert J Schallert, David M Tickler, Xavier A Harrison and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Michael J WilliamsonDepartment of Geography King's College London London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9681-8920
Emma J TebbsDepartment of Geography King's College London London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0575-1236
Terence P DawsonDepartment of Geography King's College London London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4314-1378
David J CurnickInstitute of Zoology Zoological Society of London London UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3093-1282
Francesco FerrettiDepartment of Fish and Wildlife Conservation Virginia Tech Blacksburg Va USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9510-3552
Aaron B CarlisleHopkins Marine Station Stanford University Pacific Grove CA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0796-6564
Taylor K ChappleHopkins Marine Station Stanford University Pacific Grove CA USA.
Robert J SchallertHopkins Marine Station Stanford University Pacific Grove CA USA.
David M TicklerMarine Futures Lab School of Biological Sciences University of Western Australia Perth WA Australia.
Xavier A HarrisonCentre for Ecology and Conservation University of Exeter Penryn UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2004-3601
Barbara A BlockHopkins Marine Station Stanford University Pacific Grove CA USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5181-3616
David M P JacobyInstitute of Zoology Zoological Society of London London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2729-3811
Smithsonian Marine Station · USZoological Society of London · GBKing's College London · GBThe University of Western Australia · AUUniversity of Exeter · GBVirginia Tech · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A wide array of technologies are available for gaining insight into the movement of wild aquatic animals. Although acoustic telemetry can lack the fine-scale spatial resolution of some satellite tracking technologies, the substantially longer battery life can yield important long-term data on individual behavior and movement for low per-unit cost. Typically, however, receiver arrays are designed to maximize spatial coverage at the cost of positional accuracy leading to potentially longer detection gaps as individuals move out of range between monitored locations. This is particularly true when these technologies are deployed to monitor species in hard-to-access locations.Here, we develop a novel approach to analyzing acoustic telemetry data, using the timing and duration of gaps between animal detections to infer different behaviors. Using the durations between detections at the same and different receiver locations (i.e., detection gaps), we classify behaviors into "restricted" or potential wider "out-of-range" movements synonymous with longer distance dispersal. We apply this method to investigate spatial and temporal segregation of inferred movement patterns in two sympatric species of reef shark within a large, remote, marine protected area (MPA). Response variables were generated using network analysis, and drivers of these movements were identified using generalized linear mixed models and multimodel inference.Species, diel period, and season were significant predictors of "out-of-range" movements. Silvertip sharks were overall more likely to undertake "out-of-range" movements, compared with gray reef sharks, indicating spatial segregation, and corroborating previous stable isotope work between these two species. High individual variability in "out-of-range" movements in both species was also identified.We present a novel gap analysis of telemetry data to help infer differential movement and space use patterns where acoustic coverage is imperfect and other tracking methods are impractical at scale. In remote locations, inference may be the best available tool and this approach shows that acoustic telemetry gap analysis can be used for comparative studies in fish ecology, or combined with other research techniques to better understand functional mechanisms driving behavior.

Indexed as

animal movementbiotelemetryelasmobranchsmarine protected areasnetwork analysissharksspatial and temporal segregationsympatry

Identifiers

PMID33767831
PMCPMC7981221
OpenAlexW3119346639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.