Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33767562›Full record

ArticleJournal of mid-life health

Predicting Malignancy in Adnexal Masses by the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis-Simple Rules.

Vrushti Solanki, Pratibha Singh, Charu Sharma, Navdeep Ghuman, Binit Sureka, Shashank Shekhar, Meenakshi Gothwal, Garima Yadav

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of mid-life health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound models for assessment of ovarian tumors: systematic review and meta-analysis.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vrushti SolankiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Pratibha SinghDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Charu SharmaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Navdeep GhumanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Binit SurekaDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Shashank ShekharDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Meenakshi GothwalDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Garima YadavDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences Jodhpur · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate prediction of adnexal tumors preoperatively is critical for optimal management of ovarian cancers. The International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Algorithms (IOTA) is a newer tool to characterize adnexal masses as benign or malignant.

objectiveThis study is aimed to predict malignancy in adnexal masses and differentiates benign from malignant, applying the sonography features of simple rules given by IOTA. METHODOLOGY: A prospective study was carried out at AIIMS Jodhpur for 1½ years. Women presenting with adnexal masses planned for surgery were recruited. Ultrasonography-transabdominal combined with transvaginal was done, and pelvic masses were characterized using IOTA simple rules. Patients underwent their planned surgery. Histopathology is considered the gold standard and was compared with the IOTA simple rules. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated.

resultsOne hundred and seventy-four women were included in the study, of which the majority (82.75%) were benign, the rest being frankly malignant or borderline cancer. The sensitivity of IOTA is 96.6%, specificity of 92.3%, PPV of 72.5%, NPV of 99.2%, where indeterminate cases were considered malignant.

conclusionIOTA simple rule is an effective tool for identifying malignant adnexal masses. It also suggests that IOTA-simple rules can be used as a diagnostic criterion for differentiating adnexal masses into benign and malignant on an out-patient department basis.

Indexed as

Adnexal masshistopathologyInternational Ovarian Tumour Analysis Algorithms simple rules

Identifiers

PMID33767562
PMCPMC7978049
OpenAlexW3121362771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.