Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33767520›Full record

ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2020

Anatomically-Informed Data Augmentation for Functional MRI with Applications to Deep Learning.

Kevin P Nguyen, Cherise Chin Fatt, Alex Treacher, Cooper Mellema, Madhukar H Trivedi, Albert Montillo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Are current machine learning applications comparable to radiologist classification of degenerate and herniated discs and Modic change? A systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Data Augmentation for Brain-Tumor Segmentation: A Review.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kevin P NguyenUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Cherise Chin FattUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Alex TreacherUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Cooper MellemaUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Madhukar H TrivediUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Albert MontilloUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

Funding

Establishing Moderators/Biosignatures of Antidepressant Response- Clinical CareU01MH092221 · NIMH · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI TRIVEDI, MADHUKAR H. · 2010 to 2015
$9.7M
Predicting Parkinson's Disease Progression Rate Using Causal Measures of Functional MRI with Deep Learning Predictive ModelsF31NS115348 · NINDS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI MELLEMA, COOPER JAMES · 2019 to 2021
$104k
NIMH NIH HHS U01 MH092221NINDS NIH HHS F31 NS115348
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of deep learning to build accurate predictive models from functional neuroimaging data is often hindered by limited dataset sizes. Though data augmentation can help mitigate such training obstacles, most data augmentation methods have been developed for natural images as in computer vision tasks such as CIFAR, not for medical images. This work helps to fills in this gap by proposing a method for generating new functional Magnetic Resonance Images (fMRI) with realistic brain morphology. This method is tested on a challenging task of predicting antidepressant treatment response from pre-treatment task-based fMRI and demonstrates a 26% improvement in performance in predicting response using augmented images. This improvement compares favorably to state-of-the-art augmentation methods for natural images. Through an ablative test, augmentation is also shown to substantively improve performance when applied before hyperparameter optimization. These results suggest the optimal order of operations and support the role of data augmentation method for improving predictive performance in tasks using fMRI.

Indexed as

data augmentationdeep learningdepressionfMRIneuroimaging

Identifiers

PMID33767520
PMCPMC7990266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.