Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33767373›Full record

Observational studyPediatric research2022

Transcriptome profiles discriminate between Gram-positive and Gram-negative sepsis in preterm neonates.

María Cernada, Alejandro Pinilla-González, Julia Kuligowski, José Manuel Morales, Sheila Lorente-Pozo, José David Piñeiro-Ramos, Anna Parra-Llorca, Inmaculada Lara-Cantón, Máximo Vento, Eva Serna

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Pediatric research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Look Who's Talking: Host and Pathogen Drivers ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

María CernadaDivision of Neonatology, University & Polytechnic Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain. mariacernada@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8861-6384
Alejandro Pinilla-GonzálezDivision of Neonatology, University & Polytechnic Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Julia KuligowskiNeonatal Research Group, Health Research Institute La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
José Manuel MoralesLaboratory of Metabolomics, Institute of Health Research-INCLIVA, Valencia, Spain.
Sheila Lorente-PozoNeonatal Research Group, Health Research Institute La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
José David Piñeiro-RamosNeonatal Research Group, Health Research Institute La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Anna Parra-LlorcaDivision of Neonatology, University & Polytechnic Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Inmaculada Lara-CantónDivision of Neonatology, University & Polytechnic Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Máximo VentoDivision of Neonatology, University & Polytechnic Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Eva SernaDepartment of Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe · ESLeitat Technological Center · ESUniversitat de València · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenome-wide expression profiles have been previously employed as clinical research diagnostic tools for newborn sepsis. We aimed to determine if transcriptomic profiles could discriminate between Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial sepsis in preterm infants.

methodsProspective, observational, double-cohort study was conducted in very low birth weight infants with clinical signs and culture-positive sepsis. Blood samples were collected when clinical signs became apparent. Total RNA was processed for transcriptomic analysis. Results were validated by both reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction and a mathematical model.

resultsWe included 25 septic preterm infants, 17 with Gram-positive and 8 with Gram-negative bacteria. The principal component analysis identified these two clusters of patients. We performed a predictive model based on 21 genes that showed an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 1. Eight genes were overexpressed in Gram-positive septic infants: CD37, CSK, MAN2B2, MGAT1, MOB3A, MYO9B, SH2D3C, and TEP1. The most significantly overexpressed pathways were related to metabolic and immunomodulating responses that translated into an equilibrium between pro- and anti-inflammatory responses.

conclusionsThe transcriptomic profile allowed identification of whether the causative agent was Gram-positive or Gram-negative bacteria. The overexpression of genes such as CD37 and CSK, which control cytokine production and cell survival, could explain the better clinical outcome in sepsis caused by Gram-positive bacteria. IMPACT: Transcriptomic profiles not only enable an early diagnosis of sepsis in very low birth weight infants but also discriminate between Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria as causative agents. The overexpression of some genes related to cytokine production and cell survival could explain the better clinical outcome in sepsis caused by Gram-positive bacteria, and could lead us to a future, targeted therapy.

Indexed as

BacteremiaGram-Negative Bacterial InfectionsSepsisAnti-Bacterial AgentsCohort StudiesCytokinesGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Positive BacteriaHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureProspective StudiesTranscriptomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsCytokines

Identifiers

PMID33767373
OpenAlexW3138501951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.