Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33767370›Full record

ReviewHeredity2021

Tribolium beetles as a model system in evolution and ecology.

Michael D Pointer, Matthew J G Gage, Lewis G Spurgin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heredity, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Defining the breakpoints of the vmicroPublication biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Obstacles Influence Red Flour Beetle (Tribolium castaneum) Movement More Than Path Length or Turns.Journal of experimental zoology. Part A, Ecological and integrative physiology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. 3D Printed Organisms Enabled by Aspiration-Assisted Adaptive Strategies.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael D PointerSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK. mdpointer@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7926-330X
Matthew J G GageSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Lewis G SpurginSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK. l.spurgin@uea.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0874-9281

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N011759/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flour beetles of the genus Tribolium have been utilised as informative study systems for over a century and contributed to major advances across many fields. This review serves to highlight the significant historical contribution that Tribolium study systems have made to the fields of ecology and evolution, and to promote their use as contemporary research models. We review the broad range of studies employing Tribolium to make significant advances in ecology and evolution. We show that research using Tribolium beetles has contributed a substantial amount to evolutionary and ecological understanding, especially in the fields of population dynamics, reproduction and sexual selection, population and quantitative genetics, and behaviour, physiology and life history. We propose a number of future research opportunities using Tribolium, with particular focus on how their amenability to forward and reverse genetic manipulation may provide a valuable complement to other insect models.

Indexed as

ColeopteraTriboliumAnimalsInsectaModels, BiologicalReproduction

Identifiers

PMID33767370
PMCPMC8178323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.