Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33767319›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2021

Targeted memory reactivation in REM but not SWS selectively reduces arousal responses.

Isabel C Hutchison, Stefania Pezzoli, Maria-Efstratia Tsimpanouli, Mahmoud E A Abdellahi, Gorana Pobric, Johann Hulleman, Penelope A Lewis

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Reactivation fails to offer the improvement sleep does.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Aversive memories can be weakened during human sleep via the reactivation of positive interfering memories.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Rule Abstraction Is Facilitated by Auditory Cuing in REM Sleep.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Isabel C HutchisonDepartment of Neurology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Stefania PezzoliDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2429-7334
Maria-Efstratia TsimpanouliDepartment of Neurology and Sleep Disorders Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5144-0792
Mahmoud E A AbdellahiSchool of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Gorana PobricDivision of Neuroscience & Experimental Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Johann HullemanDivision of Neuroscience & Experimental Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Penelope A LewisSchool of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK. lewisp8@cardiff.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1793-3520

Funding

Multi-Institutional Training in Genetic/Genomic Approaches to Sleep DisordersT32HL110952 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CHERVIN, RONALD D, MIGNOT, EMMANUEL J · 2013 to 2022
$5.0M
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J014478/1NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL110952
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A growing body of evidence suggests that sleep can help to decouple the memory of emotional experiences from their associated affective charge. This process is thought to rely on the spontaneous reactivation of emotional memories during sleep, though it is still unclear which sleep stage is optimal for such reactivation. We examined this question by explicitly manipulating memory reactivation in both rapid-eye movement sleep (REM) and slow-wave sleep (SWS) using targeted memory reactivation (TMR) and testing the impact of this manipulation on habituation of subjective arousal responses across a night. Our results show that TMR during REM, but not SWS significantly decreased subjective arousal, and this effect is driven by the more negative stimuli. These results support one aspect of the sleep to forget, sleep to remember (SFSR) hypothesis which proposes that emotional memory reactivation during REM sleep underlies sleep-dependent habituation.

Indexed as

AdultArousalEmotionsFemaleHumansMemoryMental RecallSleep, REMSleep, Slow-WaveYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID33767319
PMCPMC7994443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.