Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33767301›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Analysis of the response of the cell membrane of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during the detoxification of common lignocellulosic inhibitors.

Pau Cabaneros López, Chuantao Peng, Nils Arneborg, Helena Junicke, Krist V Gernaey

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Improving 5-(hydroxymethyl)furfural (HMF) tolerance ofMetabolic engineering communications · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Improving Lipid Production ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pau Cabaneros LópezProcess and Systems Engineering Center (PROSYS), Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Building 228A, 2800, Lyngby, Denmark.
Chuantao PengDepartment of Food Science, University of Copenhagen (KU), Rolighedsvej 26, 1958, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Nils ArneborgDepartment of Food Science, University of Copenhagen (KU), Rolighedsvej 26, 1958, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Helena JunickeProcess and Systems Engineering Center (PROSYS), Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Building 228A, 2800, Lyngby, Denmark.
Krist V GernaeyProcess and Systems Engineering Center (PROSYS), Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Building 228A, 2800, Lyngby, Denmark. kvg@kt.dtu.dk.
Technical University of Denmark · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gaining an in-depth understanding of the response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to the different inhibitors generated during the pretreatment of lignocellulosic material is driving the development of new strains with higher inhibitor tolerances. The objective of this study is to assess, using flow cytometry, how three common inhibitors (vanillin, furfural, and acetic acid) affect the membrane potential, the membrane permeability and the concentration of reactive oxygen species (ROS) during the different fermentations. The membrane potential decreased during the detoxification phase and reflected on the different mechanisms of the toxicity of the inhibitors. While vanillin and furfural caused a metabolic inhibition and a gradual depolarization, acetic acid toxicity was related to fast acidification of the cytosol, causing an immediate depolarization. In the absence of acetic acid, ethanol increased membrane permeability, indicating a possible acquired tolerance to ethanol due to an adaptive response to acetic acid. The intracellular ROS concentration also increased in the presence of the inhibitors, indicating oxidative stress. Measuring these features with flow cytometry allows a real-time assessment of the stress of a cell culture, which can be used in the development of new yeast strains and to design new propagation strategies to pre-adapt the cell cultures to the inhibitors.

Indexed as

Acetic AcidAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntioxidantsBenzaldehydesCell MembraneFuraldehydeLigninOxidative StressReactive Oxygen SpeciesSaccharomyces cerevisiaeAcetic AcidAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntioxidantsBenzaldehydesFuraldehydeLigninlignocelluloseReactive Oxygen Speciesvanillin

Identifiers

PMID33767301
PMCPMC7994549
OpenAlexW3136411013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.