Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33767182›Full record

ArticleNPJ genomic medicine2021

Comparison of the diagnostic yield of aCGH and genome-wide sequencing across different neurodevelopmental disorders.

Francisco Martinez-Granero, Fiona Blanco-Kelly, Carolina Sanchez-Jimeno, Almudena Avila-Fernandez, Ana Arteche, Ana Bustamante-Aragones, Cristina Rodilla, Elvira Rodríguez-Pinilla, Rosa Riveiro-Alvarez, Saoud Tahsin-Swafiri and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ genomic medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Molecular diagnosis of 405 individuals with autism spectrum disorder.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Francisco Martinez-Granero *Department of Genetics and Genomics, IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Fiona Blanco-Kelly *Department of Genetics and Genomics, IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Carolina Sanchez-JimenoDepartment of Genetics and Genomics, IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Almudena Avila-FernandezDepartment of Genetics and Genomics, IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Ana ArtecheDepartment of Genetics, 12 de Octubre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Ana Bustamante-AragonesDepartment of Genetics and Genomics, IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Cristina RodillaDepartment of Genetics and Genomics, IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2339-6872
Elvira Rodríguez-PinillaDepartment of Genetics and Genomics, IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Rosa Riveiro-AlvarezDepartment of Genetics and Genomics, IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Saoud Tahsin-SwafiriDepartment of Genetics and Genomics, IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3684-9076
Maria Jose Trujillo-TiebasDepartment of Genetics and Genomics, IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Carmen AyusoDepartment of Genetics and Genomics, IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9242-7065
Marta Rodríguez de AlbaDepartment of Genetics and Genomics, IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Isabel Lorda-SanchezDepartment of Genetics and Genomics, IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Berta AlmogueraDepartment of Genetics and Genomics, IIS-Fundación Jiménez Díaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain. balmoguera@quironsalud.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5599-2954
Instituto de Salud Carlos III · ESHospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz · ESCentre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases · ESResearch Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre · ES

Funding

Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness | Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Institute of Health Carlos III) PI18/01098
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most consensus recommendations for the genetic diagnosis of neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) do not include the use of next generation sequencing (NGS) and are still based on chromosomal microarrays, such as comparative genomic hybridization array (aCGH). This study compares the diagnostic yield obtained by aCGH and clinical exome sequencing in NDD globally and its spectrum of disorders. To that end, 1412 patients clinically diagnosed with NDDs and studied with aCGH were classified into phenotype categories: global developmental delay/intellectual disability (GDD/ID); autism spectrum disorder (ASD); and other NDDs. These categories were further subclassified based on the most frequent accompanying signs and symptoms into isolated forms, forms with epilepsy; forms with micro/macrocephaly and syndromic forms. Two hundred and forty-five patients of the 1412 were subjected to clinical exome sequencing. Diagnostic yield of aCGH and clinical exome sequencing, expressed as the number of solved cases, was compared for each phenotype category and subcategory. Clinical exome sequencing was superior than aCGH for all cases except for isolated ASD, with no additional cases solved by NGS. Globally, clinical exome sequencing solved 20% of cases (versus 5.7% by aCGH) and the diagnostic yield was highest for all forms of GDD/ID and lowest for Other NDDs (7.1% versus 1.4% by aCGH) and ASD (6.1% versus 3% by aCGH). In the majority of cases, diagnostic yield was higher in the phenotype subcategories than in the mother category. These results suggest that NGS could be used as a first-tier test in the diagnostic algorithm of all NDDs followed by aCGH when necessary.

Identifiers

PMID33767182
PMCPMC7994713
OpenAlexW3139096749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.