Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33766845›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Professional roles and relationships during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study among US clinicians.

Catherine R Butler, Susan P Y Wong, Elizabeth K Vig, Claire S Neely, Ann M O'Hare

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Simulation versus reality: what can interprofessional simulation teach us about team dynamics in the trauma bay?Global surgical education : journal of the Association for Surgical Education · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Catherine R ButlerDepartment of Medicine, Division of Nephrology and the Kidney Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA cathb@uw.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9174-8038
Susan P Y WongDepartment of Medicine, Division of Nephrology and the Kidney Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Elizabeth K VigDepartment of Hospital and Specialty Medicine, Geriatrics and Extended Care Section, Veterans Affairs Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Claire S NeelyInstitute for Clinical Systems Improvement, Bloomington, Minnesota, USA.
Ann M O'HareDepartment of Medicine, Division of Nephrology and the Kidney Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
University of Washington · USVA Puget Sound Health Care System · US

Funding

RESEARCH TRAINING IN RENAL DISEASET32DK007467 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BANSAL, NISHA, KESTENBAUM, BRYAN R · 1986 to 2023
$5.1M
Dialysis decision-making among adults with advanced kidney diseaseK23DK107799 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WONG, SUSAN PAMELA · 2016 to 2019
$657k
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK107799NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007467
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe COVID-19 pandemic has transformed healthcare delivery in the USA, but there has been little empirical work describing the impact of these changes on clinicians. We conducted a study to address the following question: how has the pandemic impacted US clinicians' professional roles and relationships?

designInductive thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews.

settingClinical settings across the USA in April and May of 2020.

participantsClinicians with leadership and/or clinical roles during the COVID-19 pandemic. MEASURES: Emergent themes related to professional roles and relationships.

resultsSixty-one clinicians participated in semi-structured interviews. Study participants were practising in 15 states across the USA, and the majority were White physicians from large academic centres. Three overlapping and inter-related themes emerged from qualitative analysis of interview transcripts: (1) disruption: boundaries between work and home life became blurred and professional identity and usual clinical roles were upended; (2) constructive adaptation: some clinicians were able to find new meaning in their work and described a spirit of collaboration, shared goals, open communication and mutual respect among colleagues; and (3) discord and estrangement: other clinicians felt alienated from their clinical roles and experienced demoralising work environments marked by division, value conflicts and mistrust.

conclusionsClinicians encountered marked disruption of their professional roles, identities and relationships during the pandemic to which they and their colleagues responded in a range of different ways. Some described a spirit of collaboration and camaraderie, while others felt alienated by their new roles and experienced work environments marked by division, value conflicts and mistrust. Our findings highlight the importance of effective teamwork and efforts to support clinician well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareInterprofessional RelationsPandemicsProfessional RoleCOVID-19FemaleHealth PersonnelHumansInterviews as TopicMaleQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2COVID-19health services administration & managementorganisation of health services

Identifiers

PMID33766845
PMCPMC7995668
OpenAlexW3136786023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.